Skip to content

REBEL vs REBEL (pre-trained) confusion #80

Description

@swissarthurfreeman

Hello,

As part of a Master's Thesis project at the University of Geneva, we're investigating REBEL's performance on a variety of
datasets, and we're struggling to understand one aspect of your (brilliant!) paper.

In the original REBEL article, the conclusion states the following :

"We make REBELpre−training available as a standalone RE for more than 200 relation types together with a pre-trained RE model to serve as a baseline when fine-tuning on new RE datasets. "

However, in the hugging face repository, the only model available seems to be rebel-large, what is this "pre-trained RE model" that can serve as a baseline ? I'm confused about this, in the paper too, you make the distinction between $REBEL$ and $REBEL_{pre-training}$ in Table 2 for example,

image

As far as I understand it, $REBEL$ here is the same model as rebel-large on hugging face, and is just the REBEL seq2seq model
trained on the REBEL dataset, and $REBEL_{pre-trained}$ refers to the fine-tuned REBEL model on the particular dataset
in whose column we are, e.g. fine tuning REBEL on NYT dataset yields an F1 score of 92.0, and this is in the line $REBEL_{pre-training}$ is my understanding correct ?

Best regards and many thanks for any pointers,

A. Freeman

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions