Support for non-numpy docstring types?

[SamuelMarks]

I like the idea of this repository. Did a quick web search to find it, if I hadn't found it, I would write my own version!

Anyway, I'm building on a bunch of codebases, which are mostly ReST style.

Instead of using docrep, have you considered using docstring-parser? - It supports ReST, Google, and Numpydoc.

Interested in your thoughts @Chilipp; depending on your perspective, happy to work on the PR.

[Chilipp]

Hi @SamuelMarks, yes, this would be great, thanks for the hint and for pointing me towards docstring-parser. I might actually base docrep on this package, I think they integrate pretty well.

depending on your perspective, happy to work on the PR.

Yes, please. thanks a lot!

[SamuelMarks]

Great I'll see what I can do.

Also sent through a PR here rubik/mando#50

Your project seem reasonably similar. Any chance for a license change so that code can be shared between the two?

[Chilipp]

Any chance for a license change so that code can be shared between the two?

sure, we can change the license into MIT @SamuelMarks, that's fine. Actually it might be worth thinking about deprecating the funcargparse package then in favor of mando. What do you think?

[SamuelMarks]

Either works. mando is interesting, but until my tests succeed I'm open to alternatives.

[SamuelMarks]

FYI: I wrote my own solution https://github.com/SamuelMarks/doctrans