Token Ownership Trading #151
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
|
+1 to this. I’m still strongly in favor. For context: I proposed “Decentralized Asset Sales” in 2017 here: CIP Proposal - Decentralized Asset Sales — design was to introduce a new separate concept from the DEX, but with the same order → match → settle feel. I’ve also approximated it in practice (e.g. on XCPFOLIO) by selling XCPFOLIO.SUBASSET on the DEX and then auto-transferring ownership of SUBASSET via server/webhooks after the fill — it works, but it’s inherently trusted/off-chain. I think the minimal shape is still clear: new message type for an ownership offer: asset, price (asset+amount), expiration match transfers payment + asset ownership keep it conceptually separate from DEX, so you can list offers make offers easily. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Could attaching Token Ownership to a UTXO be a solution here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Selling token ownership in a trustless manner sounds like something hardcore collectors would appreciate. We can collect copies of tokens now. Why not have the option to collect THE token as well. OTC sales and auctions add friction and require a third party or trust in the seller. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As a hardcore collector of token ownerships, I agree that this would be appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As discussed in the recent Counterparty Spaces with ZeroG and Adam K: https://x.com/g0barry/status/2002202432772698254
The community (for YEARS) has been asking and wanting a system to sell Token Ownership.
For people who don't understand what that is...
Trading Token Ownership opens up a whole new market that expands just DEX, Dispenser, Atomic Swap, etc functionality on xcp tokens
It is COMMON for tokens such as POWH (all original tokens burned and lost... and ONLY 0/1 token in Rare Pepe) to have very high prices on the Token Ownership itself. (spoiler this was traded OTC in auction for a couple thousand dollars at the time)
It is extremely wanted, needed and would be heavily influential to expand Token Ownership to be traded on the Counterparty DEX, Dispensers, Atomic Swaps etc
During the space, Adam mentioned this as "very difficult to do" on a protocol level. But personally I would put this protocol update as "extremely wanted by the community"
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions