Skip to content

chore: define a source curation and review cadence #62

Description

@DevSecNinja

Why

The briefing quality depends heavily on source quality. As more feeds are added, Wazzup needs a lightweight way to keep sources useful, timely, and not overly noisy.

Scope

  • Define criteria for adding, keeping, muting, or removing feeds.
  • Review source health, timeout behavior, duplicate rate, quality, and topic fit.
  • Consider a periodic source review checklist or generated source-quality report.
  • Keep room for personal taste: this is not meant to become a generic news aggregator.

Acceptance criteria

  • Source curation criteria are documented.
  • Noisy or failing sources have a clear review path.
  • Future feed additions can be evaluated consistently.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions