[Epic] Portfolio Polish and Demo

[Dyu20705]

Outcome

Present verified RunSift capability and measured tradeoffs clearly after a working release exists. Portfolio work must demonstrate real CLI behavior and evidence rather than mock production maturity.

Child issue

• [Docs] Publish reproducible quickstart, architecture, examples, limitations, and MLOps case study #16 — README quickstart, diagrams, examples, limitations, and MLOps relevance

Preconditions

• [Release] Verify and publish RunSift CLI v0.1.0 MVP #35 publishes a reproducible MVP release.
• Demo assets must be generated from released code and sanitized fixtures.
• Claims about user value or future direction must reference [Validation] Evaluate MVP evidence and choose RunSift's next phase #36 when available.

Definition of Done

• A reviewer can understand problem, scope, architecture, safety boundaries, and demo in under five minutes.
• Commands and outputs are reproducible from a clean environment.
• Architecture diagrams distinguish implemented components from planned phases.
• Screenshots/recordings contain no private logs, tokens, or personal data.
• The case study includes design decisions, rejected alternatives, failure modes, and negative results.
• MLOps relevance is tied to reproducibility, evaluation, uncertainty, data quality, and rollback—not generic tooling claims.
• Future capabilities are labeled as hypotheses or roadmap items.

Non-goals

• polishing placeholder output before core behavior exists
• presenting synthetic fixture metrics as product validation
• adding dashboards or infrastructure solely for screenshots