[Critical] 测试覆盖严重不足：核心逻辑零测试

[Colin4k1024]

问题描述

项目测试覆盖严重不足，核心逻辑完全没有测试。

测试现状

模块	测试状态
evolve.js	❌ 零测试
solidify.js	❌ 零测试
prompt.js	❌ 零测试
bridge.js	❌ 零测试
selector.js	✅ 有测试
signals.js	✅ 有测试

现有测试文件：

• a2aProtocol.test.js
• contentHash.test.js
• envFingerprint.test.js
• mutation.test.js
• sanitize.test.js
• selector.test.js
• signals.test.js
• skillDistiller.test.js
• strategy.test.js
• validationReport.test.js

影响

• 核心进化逻辑无法验证正确性
• 重构风险高，容易引入 bug
• 无法自动化检测回归问题

建议

1. 为 evolve.js 和 solidify.js 添加单元测试
2. 添加集成测试验证完整进化周期
3. 引入测试工具 mock 文件系统操作

---

严重程度: Critical
分类: Testing

[autogame-17]

Thank you @Colin4k1024 for this analysis. The observation is accurate -- the core modules lack test coverage.

Context:

The existing 10 test files cover utility/pure-function modules (selector.js, signals.js, mutation.js, contentHash.js, etc.) which are straightforward to unit test. The core modules (evolve.js, solidify.js) are tightly coupled to filesystem operations, git commands, and network calls, making them significantly harder to test without substantial mocking infrastructure.

Roadmap:

1. Short-term: Extract pure-function logic from solidify.js (constraint checking, diff parsing, policy evaluation) into testable helper modules, and add unit tests for those
2. Medium-term: Build an integration test harness with mock filesystem and git state to test full evolution cycles
3. Long-term: Increase coverage of evolve.js main loop by testing individual phases in isolation

We use the Node.js built-in test runner (node --test), and new tests will follow the same pattern as existing ones. Community contributions for test cases are welcome -- especially for edge cases you've encountered while using evolver.