Their federation of seismic observation sites (the IRIS consortium makes sites findable via unified metadata and exchange standards.
This echoes our needs and resonates with our current activities to register omic observatories centrally to allow discovery of their resources.
Coordination of site registry metadata with other partners (@rduerr I'm thinking Earth Cube) may align us early so our registries can interoperate.
In discussions at EGU 2019, @edu-iris notes that their SiteML is quite community-specific and we may need a metamodel.
@cmungall I'm thinking that each community could spin up a lightweight ontology which links their sites (instances) to the phenomena they measure (e.g. seismic events from ENVO, microbial communities from PCO, etc). Merging those ontologies would allow cross domain search.
Their federation of seismic observation sites (the IRIS consortium makes sites findable via unified metadata and exchange standards.
This echoes our needs and resonates with our current activities to register omic observatories centrally to allow discovery of their resources.
Coordination of site registry metadata with other partners (@rduerr I'm thinking Earth Cube) may align us early so our registries can interoperate.
In discussions at EGU 2019, @edu-iris notes that their SiteML is quite community-specific and we may need a metamodel.
@cmungall I'm thinking that each community could spin up a lightweight ontology which links their sites (instances) to the phenomena they measure (e.g. seismic events from ENVO, microbial communities from PCO, etc). Merging those ontologies would allow cross domain search.