Should user be able to send directly to people he received payments from?

[sirpy]

twitter question:
"we got this question in Twitter: When my friend sends me money why can't I see his wallet address so that I can send it back to him? it was designed like that or it is a bug?"

the user expected to see the wallet address of his friend somewhere (ie in feed item) and be able to copy it and send to him back

[LiavGut]

Good one.
@sirpy can we make the contacts in the TX cards be clickable and direct to their profile?
if so, we can add there the address
or even add SEND G$ DIRECTLY button to their profile.

[LiavGut]

@sirpy On second thought, we don't want to show the Blockchain address in the front.
So only adding a "send G$ directly" button in the other user profile.

[sirpy]

@LiavGut @tomerGD yes that would be better, the only questions is why?
because the point of payment links is for receiver to be active
that is why we removed for web the ability to send directly by email or by mobile

[LiavGut]

@sirpy I think the answer is that once they already did at least one tx via payment link between them, then they are both "active" enough, and it's the expected behavior, just make it easy for the users.

[tomerGD]

@sirpy @LiavGut We agreed there's a problem that users want to send G$ to people who sent them in the past, it's about finding the solution to the problem, not about giving them what they ask for.

we need to make a user flow and design to discuss around.

[LiavGut]

@tomerGD ok, I'm on it.