Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
|
Thank you for your active support! ollama does seem like a good one. Depending on the changes, I'm considering adding this as an optional pip flag Would you offer more info on the changes involved? |
|
You can see the changes in my fork. The changes in GPT.py were already updated in your repo, the base_node change is just a personal preference. The Ollama changes are all in the llm_api folder, the init and utils get updated, and the new ollama.py. I added 2 new optional parameters to the get_query function, but it could work fine with environment variables, following the pattern of the Azure and OpenAI details. Thank you! |
|
Thanks for the clarifications. |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I created an ollama.py script that handles an Ollama client and it works fine as an integration. It does require a few other file changes. Any thoughts about adding support for Ollama? I thought Ollama was better than individual local LLM support because many different versions can all be supported with one class. Thank you!
All reactions