Skip to content

[v1 readiness] Legolas release gate epic (no version bump) #109

Description

@JeremyDev87

[v1 readiness] Legolas release gate epic (no version bump)

Goal

Create a v1.0.0 readiness track for JeremyDev87/legolas that excludes version bump/tag/publish work and instead makes the release candidate contract, artifact verification, and documentation evidence executable.

Source of Truth

  • Default branch verified as master.

  • Open issues and open PRs were empty at planning time.

  • Local TODO.md says active tracking moved to GitHub issues and FIT plan docs, but live open issue list was empty.

  • Package manifest showed Rust CLI + npm launcher with vendor layout and release contract tests.

  • Parent implementation plan artifact: /Users/pjw/.hermes/thread-workcells/discord/282499436049858561/1508085811139051580/TASKS/v1-ddplan-issues/IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md

  • This is an issue-planning epic only. It must not create branches, commits, PRs, release tags, npm publishes, or version bumps.

Wiki Context Manifest

  • Queries attempted: frontend evidence gates release evidence contract, code is not cheap AI maintenance cost ratio, alex core invariants SSoT No Silent Fallback idempotency, 12-factor agents runtime contract event log release workflow, overeager coding agents task scope destructive action, prompt assets skill issue planning evidence
  • Wiki sources read: [wiki: frontend/evidence-gates.md], [wiki: principles/code-is-not-cheap.md], [wiki: principles/alex-core-invariants.md], [wiki: harness-engineering/12-factor-agents-runtime-contract.md], [wiki: harness-engineering/overeager-coding-agents-scope-contract.md], [wiki: harness-engineering/prompt-assets.md], [wiki: raw/2026-05-24-ai-maintenance-cost-ratio-source-map.md]
  • Relevant wiki facts: v1 readiness requires artifact/runtime/evidence bundles, not only test-green; release and wrapper flows must preserve SSoT, atomicity, idempotency, and No Silent Fallback; destructive or fix-like commands need task-scope/evidence gates; AI-generated velocity must lower future maintenance cost rather than add broad v1 scope.
  • remember-wiki applicability / skip reason: skipped; target repos are JeremyDev87/* personal CLI repos, not Remember/dramancompany repos.
  • Non-wiki inference: repo-specific split below is based on live local repo docs/config/workflows and npm registry checks performed before issue creation.

Quality Lens Router Output

  • Applicable gate families:
    • evidence-contract: v1 readiness, package install, CLI output, release/publish, and fallback claims need concrete proof.
    • simplicity-deletability: v1 work must prefer contract/evidence gaps over broad new features or nonessential abstractions.
    • tdd-systematic-debugging: false-positive, fallback, exit-code, and packaging regressions should be fixture/test-backed.
  • Skipped gates:
    • frontend-design: not-applicable; CLI/runtime/docs work only.
    • vercel-agent-skills: not-applicable; no React/Next/Vercel/mobile surface.
    • deploy-token-safety: limited; no token/deploy mutation in this issue, only release credential evidence requirements.

Evidence Contract

  • Required evidence:
    • Candidate SHA/version alignment evidence when a candidate is selected.
    • Repo test evidence plus source CLI smoke.
    • npm pack / packed-install evidence for the user-consumed artifact.
    • Release workflow/check/dist-tag/GitHub Release evidence where release automation is touched.
    • Explicit fallback/unsupported-platform evidence where wrapper/native-runtime selection is touched.
  • Evidence not applicable:
    • Browser screenshot/DOM: not-applicable, CLI repos.
    • Production URL: not-applicable, npm/GitHub release surface only.
  • Blocking evidence gaps:
    • Final v1 version bump/tag is intentionally out of scope for this issue set.

Non-Goals

  • No version bump.
  • No release tag or npm publish.
  • No live CI workflow dispatch unless a child issue explicitly asks for a safe dry-run and the maintainer approves.
  • No broad new product scope without evidence that it reduces future maintenance cost.

Issue-PR Strategy

  • One PR per child issue by default.
  • If two child issues need the same workflow/docs files, sequence them instead of creating conflicting parallel PRs.
  • Parent closes only when all child issues are completed or consciously deferred with evidence.

Child issue matrix

Lane Issue Purpose Dependency
L1 #110 [v1 readiness][legolas] FIT tracker and v1 scope reconciliation Parent only
L2 #111 [v1 readiness][legolas] Machine output and budget contract freeze Prefer after L1 scope reconciliation.
L3 #112 [v1 readiness][legolas] Parser and lockfile regression fixture gate Coordinate with L2 if output fields change.
L4 #113 [v1 readiness][legolas] Vendor layout and packed install platform smoke Can run after L1
L5 #114 [v1 readiness][legolas] Release workflow evidence and docs parity Best after L2/L4 define final output/artifact gates.

Parallelization Decision

  • Contract/scope child should run first when it affects downstream acceptance criteria.
  • Artifact/CI children can run in parallel with safety/fixture children if file ownership does not overlap.
  • Final docs parity child should usually run last, after contract and evidence gates settle.

Completion criteria

  • Child issues have live labels and JeremyDev87 assignee.
  • Each child issue includes Owned files, Inspect-only files, Must not touch, validation/evidence, and dependency notes.
  • Parent matrix links all children.
  • No literal Unicode escape sequences are present in issue titles/bodies.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

choreMaintenance and repository housekeepingci

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions