Decentralized Jury Selection & Incentives for Disputes

[Luluameh]

Background
Relying solely on platform admins or a fixed multi-sig committee for disputes lacks decentralization. A jury of random, high-reputation experts should be able to vote on disputes.
Goal
Implement a decentralized jury selection and voting system for disputed sessions, rewarding jurors from platform fee shares.
Acceptance Criteria

• Randomly select 3 or 5 active, highly rated experts as potential jurors when a dispute is opened.
• Jurors cast encrypted or standard votes on resolution payouts (Seeker vs. Expert split).
• Majority vote decides the outcome.
• Active jurors are compensated with a share of the disputed escrow.
  Key Files
  contracts/src/disputes.rs, contracts/src/reputation.rs