Legitimate domains, IPs, IPFS hashes, or IPNS names
Legitimate domains, IPs, IPFS hashes, or IPNS names
Please explain why this content is legitimate
We are requesting a review of a false-positive “malicious website detected” warning in MetaMask when users try to connect a wallet to https://fun.shib.world.
fun.shib.world is a public token launchpad dApp. Users connect a wallet to create/trade tokens through published smart contracts. The site does not ask for a Secret Recovery Phrase, private key, or password, and it does not present a fake MetaMask UI.
We already checked the public MetaMask phishing detector / eth-phishing-detect list. The domain does not appear as blocked there. The warning still appears in the MetaMask connection flow. This looks like it is coming from another detection source (hotlist / client-side detection / Blockaid or similar), not the public GitHub blocklist entry.
On-chain contracts used by the dApp:
| Contract |
Address |
| TrackerDeployer |
0x6cDa047e313CA3D38A646cb0742915642492C284 |
| ShibLaunchpad |
0x72171144b37F22424803aA92A61cE0d827ADd3e9 |
| TokenFactory |
0xD7Bc75f6100754AeF46302037A390651df10c955 |
Public announcement / community support:
https://x.com/shibarium_/status/2093721104988926083
That post publicly announced the first product release at https://fun.shib.world/
Please review the domain and remove or correct the flag so users can connect without a malicious-site interstitial. If the flag is coming from a partner list (e.g. Blockaid), please point us to the correct removal path or forward the case.
Please explain why this content is legitimate
No response
Is this a duplicate request?
Legitimate domains, IPs, IPFS hashes, or IPNS names
Legitimate domains, IPs, IPFS hashes, or IPNS names
Please explain why this content is legitimate
We are requesting a review of a false-positive “malicious website detected” warning in MetaMask when users try to connect a wallet to https://fun.shib.world.
fun.shib.worldis a public token launchpad dApp. Users connect a wallet to create/trade tokens through published smart contracts. The site does not ask for a Secret Recovery Phrase, private key, or password, and it does not present a fake MetaMask UI.We already checked the public MetaMask phishing detector / eth-phishing-detect list. The domain does not appear as blocked there. The warning still appears in the MetaMask connection flow. This looks like it is coming from another detection source (hotlist / client-side detection / Blockaid or similar), not the public GitHub blocklist entry.
On-chain contracts used by the dApp:
0x6cDa047e313CA3D38A646cb0742915642492C2840x72171144b37F22424803aA92A61cE0d827ADd3e90xD7Bc75f6100754AeF46302037A390651df10c955Public announcement / community support:
https://x.com/shibarium_/status/2093721104988926083
That post publicly announced the first product release at https://fun.shib.world/
Please review the domain and remove or correct the flag so users can connect without a malicious-site interstitial. If the flag is coming from a partner list (e.g. Blockaid), please point us to the correct removal path or forward the case.
Please explain why this content is legitimate
No response
Is this a duplicate request?