There are some email clients that add noise to the header field in-reply-to. For example,
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2012-August.txt.gz :
From julien at danjou.info Wed Aug 8 19:52:08 2012
From: julien at danjou.info (Julien Danjou)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:52:08 +0200
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] weekly meeting - CloudWatch
functionality
In-Reply-To: <502297C2.8000501@canonical.com> (Nick Barcet's message of "Wed,
08 Aug 2012 17:45:54 +0100")
References: <20120808050953.GA18516@redhat.com>
<502297C2.8000501@canonical.com>
Message-ID: <874nod17rr.fsf@dex.adm.naquadah.org>
On Wed, Aug 08 2012, Nick Barcet wrote:
[...]
The actual Message-id is <502297C2.8000501@canonical.com>, without the garbage at the end (which is how it is in References).
There are some email clients that add noise to the header field
in-reply-to. For example,http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2012-August.txt.gz :
The actual
Message-idis<502297C2.8000501@canonical.com>, without the garbage at the end (which is how it is inReferences).