Skip to content

Encoding the DID update document - why JSON #11

Description

@AngusP

Even though the main DID spec 'expects' JSON, you are already implicitly constructing that document for single-key OP_RETURN DIDs (as do other specs like did:key); so you could use CBOR or bencode or some other more space-efficient (and ∴ cheaper) encoding than "just" ASCII JSON in an inscription/envelope?

Perhaps the spec should also specify UTF-8 encoding even though that's what everyone would guess

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions