Skip to content

MI CDM: DICOM Series (0008,103E) naming conventions for ETL #209

@terimsippel

Description

@terimsippel

Issue Name:
MI CDM: Series (0008,103E) naming conventions in Procedure_occurrence CDM table as procedure_concept_id

Issue Type:
Lack of ETL convention:
provide guidance to improve consistency of ETL for imaging series naming conventions.

Description: Link to section of documentation which lacks or has unclear descriptions, description of idea of interest and the multiple standard concept_ids to represent this idea, or description of idea of interest and the different ways these data can be ETL’d into the CDM with standard concept_ids.

Related forum post: The MI WG will create an OHDSI Forum post and edit/add link here after review and consensus within the MI WG.

Suggested solution:
Solution should consider the following:

  1. The RSNA Informatics Council has Series Naming conventions available at: https://www.rsna.org/practice-tools/data-tools-and-standards/radlex-playbook-series
  2. MIDRC has a publicly available Series naming unification software which has been used extensively.
  3. DICOM provides Series Code Sequence Attributes. Which DICOM tag to use in CDM?

Reported By: Teri Sippel Schmidt for MI WG (tsippel1@jh.edu)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions