Skip to content

Device Database naming and legal process #132

Description

@cristinaluengo

Problem statement

To enable branding work linked to the Device Database, it’s necessary to do a preliminary naming exercise and work to find the appropriate name proposal for the product, and then proceed to the correct trademark registration and other legal activities to guarantee its protection.

Community signals

No response

Scope & Boundaries

In scope

  • Shortlist preparation and presentation
  • Legal check
  • Internal agreement on final name
  • Legal and registration/trademark work

Not in scope

  • Brand development (OHF brand architecture)
  • Value proposition
  • Logo in all required variants
  • Domain and OHF project section
  • Launch assets and communications

Foreseen solution

No response

Risks & open questions

  • The legal timeline might take longer than expected before we’re ready to execute the next steps
  • Brand development is tied to the decision made on naming

Appetite

  • Medium: dependant on legal timeline, which can impact on progress
  • Brand development work might need to be tackled in an upcoming cycle

Execution issues

No response

Decision log

Date Decision Outcome

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions