Skip to content

Questioning project structure, re: "math/core/sources" #258

@georgercarder

Description

@georgercarder

Seeing some project structure choices that feel questionable. Granted, I am not that familiar with Rust, so you may be following convention there, if so please correct me. Yes, this repo is so far small and tractable, but this questionable structure I fear may impact both discoverability/readability and maintainability as it grows.

Why is the "math" section not under the "contracts"?

Why is there a folder named "sources" when "src" is often convention rarely as far down in the hierarchy.

math/core/sources !!!??

Please correct me if this is common in Rust projects, but to me it feels off.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions