Why No Perfect Strategy? Can't You Just Combine Them Better? #18
michaeljiangmingfeng-debug
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Great question. Let's think through it.
If you combined all eight strategies equally, you'd get: smooth returns + moderate drawdown. Boring. It'd also be average at everything—not exceptional at anything.
The Beautiful Part: Strategy Characters
Strategies have different characters:
Combining Creates Balance, Not Perfection
The Cross-Market Defense portfolio (25% each: CNH-CHAU, DIP-A, IF-IC, PCR) returned +357.7% with a tame -17.4% drawdown because different strategies shine at different times.
But is that portfolio perfect for you? Probably not.
Maybe you want more upside and can tolerate more downside. Then the Nasdaq Full Power (50% E3X + 50% DIP-US) is better: +1391%, -65.6% drawdown.
The Core Philosophy
This is why we don't optimize for a universal benchmark. We optimize for your choice.
Strategies are objective; portfolios are subjective.
We won't distort a strategy's character to chase a prettier curve. Each strategy preserves its original edge, its original weakness, its original beauty. You combine them based on your understanding, your risk tolerance, your market view.
Try it yourself: Playground
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions