Skip to content

Docs - Clean up Payment Detection use case page #29

@MantisClone

Description

@MantisClone

Problem

Payment Detection use case page contains AI warning, speculative content, unverified chain counts (claims 10+ but actual is 9), placeholder links, and marketing language that needs cleanup.

Key issues:

  • AI-generated warning box at top
  • Claims "10+ EVM chains" but should be 9 (Fantom deprecated)
  • Marketing copy vs factual benefits-focused language
  • Multiple placeholder # links
  • References to 553+ tokens needs verification
  • No tooltips for technical terms (blockchain, confirmations, webhooks, etc.)

Proposed Solution

Apply Invoicing page cleanup template to Payment Detection page:

  • Remove AI warning box
  • Verify and update chain count to 9
  • Replace marketing language with factual, benefits-focused copy
  • Fix or remove placeholder links (add notes for future pages)
  • Verify token count claim against codebase
  • Add tooltips for technical terms (blockchain, smart contract, webhook, confirmation, etc.)
  • Consider adding Check callout after key sections
  • Review code examples for accuracy
  • Verify detection speeds against actual performance
  • Update "Detection-Only vs Full Workflows" section for clarity

Considerations

  • Marketing page at https://request.network/payment-detection claims "25+ blockchains" but docs should reflect API reality (9 EVM chains)
  • Payment Detection is core functionality - accuracy is critical
  • Page is already comprehensive with good structure - focus on accuracy and removing slop
  • Code examples should be tested and realistic
  • Detection speeds should be verified (currently claims ~15s Ethereum, ~2s Polygon)

References

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

Status

✅ Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions