Description
Overview
Lighthouse Best Practices audit has identified multiple high-severity browser security gaps that weaken the application's overall security posture. These findings indicate missing document-level security controls and browser isolation mechanisms that are considered modern web security standards.
While the application remains functional, the absence of these protections increases exposure to client-side attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Clickjacking, and Cross-Origin exploitation.
Current Findings
High Severity Security Issues
- No Content Security Policy (CSP) found in enforcement mode
- No Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) header found
- No frame control policy found (X-Frame-Options / frame-ancestors)
- No Trusted Types directive configured in CSP
Additional Observations
- Third-party cookies detected from Google Identity Services
- Browser Issues Panel reports unresolved security-related warnings
- Missing security hardening headers that are recommended by Lighthouse
Expected Improvements
Content Security Policy (CSP)
- Configure a strict CSP in enforcement mode
- Restrict execution of untrusted scripts
- Reduce the risk of XSS attacks
Cross-Origin Isolation
- Implement COOP headers
- Improve browsing context isolation
- Reduce cross-origin interaction risks
Clickjacking Protection
- Configure
X-Frame-Options
OR
- Add
frame-ancestors directive in CSP
- Prevent unauthorized embedding of application pages
Trusted Types Integration
- Enable Trusted Types policy
- Protect DOM sinks from unsafe data injection
- Improve resistance against DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities
Acceptance Criteria
Impact
Implementing these security controls will establish a stronger browser security baseline, improve Lighthouse Best Practices compliance, and align the application with modern web security recommendations while maintaining compatibility with existing functionality.
Supporting Evidence
Lighthouse Audit Report
The identified security and best-practice issues are documented in the attached Lighthouse audit report.
agloforge.pdf
- Lighthouse Best Practices Report (PDF)
Relevant Findings from the Report
- Best Practices Score: 77
- No Content Security Policy (CSP) found in enforcement mode
- No Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) header found
- No frame control policy found
- No Trusted Types directive configured
- Third-party cookies detected
- Security-related warnings reported in Chrome DevTools Issues panel
Reference
Please refer to the attached PDF report for complete audit details, severity indicators, and Lighthouse diagnostics used to identify the above findings.
Description
Overview
Lighthouse Best Practices audit has identified multiple high-severity browser security gaps that weaken the application's overall security posture. These findings indicate missing document-level security controls and browser isolation mechanisms that are considered modern web security standards.
While the application remains functional, the absence of these protections increases exposure to client-side attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Clickjacking, and Cross-Origin exploitation.
Current Findings
High Severity Security Issues
Additional Observations
Expected Improvements
Content Security Policy (CSP)
Cross-Origin Isolation
Clickjacking Protection
X-Frame-OptionsOR
frame-ancestorsdirective in CSPTrusted Types Integration
Acceptance Criteria
Impact
Implementing these security controls will establish a stronger browser security baseline, improve Lighthouse Best Practices compliance, and align the application with modern web security recommendations while maintaining compatibility with existing functionality.
Supporting Evidence
Lighthouse Audit Report
The identified security and best-practice issues are documented in the attached Lighthouse audit report.
agloforge.pdf
Relevant Findings from the Report
Reference
Please refer to the attached PDF report for complete audit details, severity indicators, and Lighthouse diagnostics used to identify the above findings.