You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 29, 2025. It is now read-only.
After creating some rough benchmarks for runtime performance comparison between PHAR and Sqon, I realized that the first run for a PHAR kicked Sqon's butt. I believe that this has something to do with the phar extension's support for stream wrapping. An attempt should be made to offer something similar with Sqon.
Resolution
I am hoping to see faster run times when a Sqon is first run and for each subsequent run. This improvement should take advantage of PHP's optimizations (i.e. opcode caching).
Problem
After creating some rough benchmarks for runtime performance comparison between PHAR and Sqon, I realized that the first run for a PHAR kicked Sqon's butt. I believe that this has something to do with the
pharextension's support for stream wrapping. An attempt should be made to offer something similar with Sqon.Resolution
I am hoping to see faster run times when a Sqon is first run and for each subsequent run. This improvement should take advantage of PHP's optimizations (i.e. opcode caching).
References