Description
Every Stellar Wave issue in this repo (247 of the last 249) follows the same Description / Requirements and context / Suggested execution / Example commit message / Guidelines structure, but .github/ has no ISSUE_TEMPLATE directory, meaning the format is maintained purely by convention/copy-paste rather than being codified.
This is repository-level tooling, configuration, or process rather than application code, but that doesn't make it lower stakes: onboarding friction, unclear ownership, and process gaps are consistently what determines whether a project with this much surface area (two contract trees, two backend trees, two frontend apps, a static dashboard, and an active external contributor program) stays maintainable as it grows or slowly accumulates inconsistency that nobody has the full context to untangle.
Given that this repository is actively recruiting outside contributors through the Stellar Wave bounty program (this issue included), the quality of its repository-level scaffolding, from CONTRIBUTING.md to CODEOWNERS to its issue and PR templates, has a direct and measurable effect on how many contributors are able to land a change successfully on their first attempt versus giving up in the setup phase.
Requirements and context
- Add
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/stellar-wave-bounty.md codifying the exact structure used across existing issues
Suggested execution
- Fork the repo and create a branch
git checkout -b chore/issue-template-stellar-wave
- Implement changes
- Add the issue template file with the
Stellar Wave label pre-applied
- Test and commit
- Open the 'New issue' page in the GitHub UI and confirm the template appears
Example commit message
chore: add issue template for Stellar Wave bounty format
Guidelines
- Assignment required before starting
- PR description must include:
Closes #[issue_id]
- Keep PR description professional and detailed
Description
Every Stellar Wave issue in this repo (247 of the last 249) follows the same Description / Requirements and context / Suggested execution / Example commit message / Guidelines structure, but
.github/has noISSUE_TEMPLATEdirectory, meaning the format is maintained purely by convention/copy-paste rather than being codified.This is repository-level tooling, configuration, or process rather than application code, but that doesn't make it lower stakes: onboarding friction, unclear ownership, and process gaps are consistently what determines whether a project with this much surface area (two contract trees, two backend trees, two frontend apps, a static dashboard, and an active external contributor program) stays maintainable as it grows or slowly accumulates inconsistency that nobody has the full context to untangle.
Given that this repository is actively recruiting outside contributors through the Stellar Wave bounty program (this issue included), the quality of its repository-level scaffolding, from
CONTRIBUTING.mdtoCODEOWNERSto its issue and PR templates, has a direct and measurable effect on how many contributors are able to land a change successfully on their first attempt versus giving up in the setup phase.Requirements and context
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/stellar-wave-bounty.mdcodifying the exact structure used across existing issuesSuggested execution
Stellar Wavelabel pre-appliedExample commit message
chore: add issue template for Stellar Wave bounty formatGuidelines
Closes #[issue_id]