Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
personally, i like the idea, i'm kinda a newbie with github so keeping two different branches for the lib would be perfect however, we should warn futur contributors somewhere that they should clone/fork the dev branch |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently
mainbranch.release/*branches.1.0.6.A problem with this approach is that we need to back track and create a
release/*branch to get the changes published in the NuGet package.Proposal
We introduce a "pre-release" NuGet package.
devbranch and be integrated quickly.devbranch per commit/merge.-beta,-dev, or similar. See pre-release versions for ideas. i.e.1.0.6-dev.<Version>of thedevbranch will be ahead ofmain, but subject to semantic versioning. e.g. breaking changes, bug fixes.Rational
This library is under active development; a pre-release NuGet package version is a good way to protect the release package version from breaking changes while allow active developer to contribute to the next big release.
Changes to developer flow
1.0.6-dev).Would love to hear feedback from all: @MatejMa2ur, @kjoergensen-foreflight, @kubikpatrick, @mlidodo.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions