Skip to content

the results on STAR is lower than paper #10

@LoverLost

Description

@LoverLost

Hi, I used your [pre-trained SeViLA localizer checkpoints] on QVHighlights to fine-tune answerer and self-refinement localizer on STAR. I ensure that the same batch_size is used for training with 2 GPUs(A100-sxm-80GB). I got the results 60.10 and 61.69 at each step, which is lower than 62.7 and 64.9 given in the paper. Is there any different processing used in training?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions