Skip to content

Questionable Glyph used in Placeholders #7

@fireproofsocks

Description

@fireproofsocks

Using the # glyph to denote a new type of placeholder tag is a bit troublesome because that tag is supported as a MODX comment, so the package ends up having the unexpected behavior of parsing MODX comments. It would probably be better to use a glyph that was not ear-marked by MODX (I'm not sure if the "#" comment marks are deprecated or not).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions