Skip to content

Enterprise evidence: generate quality and efficiency reports #151

Description

@tcballard

Why

Shadow observations are useful only when they become decision-grade evidence rather than a dashboard of raw counters.

Scope

  • Define versioned evidence-report schemas.
  • Compare production and candidate routes on quality, latency, errors, usage, and cost class.
  • Report sample sizes, missingness, confidence intervals, and judge agreement.
  • Support deterministic human labels and explicitly versioned automated evaluators.
  • Produce an outcome of enforce, keep shadowing, or do not enforce with reasons.
  • Export bounded machine-readable and human-readable reports.

Acceptance criteria

  • Reports cannot claim significance without the required sample and confidence threshold.
  • Automated evaluation is clearly separated from observed provider outcomes and human labels.
  • Prompt/response inclusion is opt-in, access-controlled, and retention-bounded.
  • Reports are reproducible from their versioned evidence inputs.
  • Tests cover sparse, biased, missing, conflicting, and statistically inconclusive evidence.

Parent: #146

Invariant

The scored model decision remains offline, deterministic, keyless, and explainable.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions