+ 
+
+
+
+
+ 
{copy[step]}
; +} + +function QuestionStep() { + return ( ++ This training exercise asks whether a declared runner can return an expected discrete classification and preserve a deliberately challenging alternative. +
+Review the clarity and sufficiency of the packet. Do not approve science, security, cryptography, or independence policy.
+Method status: DEMO. This is a visual review walkthrough, not executable benchmark logic.
++ The synthetic packet proposes that a hypothetical material fixture yields an illustrative wurtzite-like classification. Supporting and challenging fixtures are shown together so a reviewer can test the argument instead of seeing only favorable evidence. +
+No physical material, scientific validity, cryptographic assurance, or independence is implied or claimed. DEMO / SYNTHETIC.
+{item}
+Stop and mark “Insufficient evidence” if the packet appears to select a cryptographic suite, imply scientific acceptance, hide counterevidence, or claim independent-person assurance.
+