Skip to content

Inconsistent MPD numbering in the industrial subsection #28

@ftessier

Description

@ftessier

The top-level metrology needs document explains that the last number in the MPD numbering scheme is the current revision of the document.

However, in the industrial MPDs, the D.08.. and D.09.. MPDs use the last digit to denote entirely different documents. The semantic versioning ought to be consistent throughout.

https://github.com/ftessier/cirms/blob/a6335092cee24bb4609c7fdc7875f62e61c4f5c0/needs-report/metrology-needs/industrial-material/industrial-material.md?plain=1#L92-L96

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

industrialSection C industrial needs

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions