What is the policy/attitude towards LLM contributions in Chez Scheme?

[zyd-n]

Hi, I'm looking over a bunch of Scheme implementations to see how projects contributors and maintainers are responding to the proliferation of LLMs. I don't see anything that resembles an official 'policy' or guideline to LLM generated/assisted/enhanced/based/<whatever> contributions.

There does seem to be some contributors using LLMs in some way but I'm unsure if anything LLM generated has landed directly into Chez. See Claude in:

• add __collect_errno foreign-procedure convention for reliable errno c… #999
• add __errno, _alloc, and __disable_interrupts foreign procedure conventions #1013

Are LLM contributions welcomed in Chez Scheme by the maintainers and contributors?

@gus-massa @mflatt

[jltaylor-us]

Are LLM contributions welcomed in Chez Scheme by the maintainers and contributors?

Not by this one.

[burgerrg]

I expect the author of a change request to be familiar with all the changes and to cite explicitly which changes were produced by anyone or anything else. I am wary of LLM-generated code.