To help motivate adoption and development of the spec, we need to layout it's advantages for different stakeholders.
I propose we write the following 4 posts as a starter
-
How does this approach benefit facilitators? How can it enable flexible process execution across multiple tools
-
How does it benefit participants. Data ownership, ability to migrate their participation, single identity across interactions
-
How does it benefit communities. How does this allow communities to seamlessly select the tools and processes they want to self govern. How do they maintain selective membership and privacy? How might this approach enable hierarchical community decision making ( a national level democratic deliberation that is in part delegated to local communities and then sythesised back up.)
-
How can exciting government, power holder use the spect to responsibly engage the people they govern.
Happy to take. A first pass on these
To help motivate adoption and development of the spec, we need to layout it's advantages for different stakeholders.
I propose we write the following 4 posts as a starter
How does this approach benefit facilitators? How can it enable flexible process execution across multiple tools
How does it benefit participants. Data ownership, ability to migrate their participation, single identity across interactions
How does it benefit communities. How does this allow communities to seamlessly select the tools and processes they want to self govern. How do they maintain selective membership and privacy? How might this approach enable hierarchical community decision making ( a national level democratic deliberation that is in part delegated to local communities and then sythesised back up.)
How can exciting government, power holder use the spect to responsibly engage the people they govern.
Happy to take. A first pass on these