Slice 2: visitor-framed answers (grounded, faithfulness-guarded)

[domuk-k]

Parent

#26

What to build

Once a visitorType is known (from Slice 1), the agent frames its answers for that visitor — grounded in the notes, never inflating.

• Framing is a pure function: framingFor(visitorCtx) → instructionFragment, injected into generation.
  • recruiter → hireable strengths + concrete proof
  • peer developer → technical depth
  • unknown / 안 밝힘 → neutral (no framing)
• Framing changes emphasis and angle, never the facts. Selling = framing true facts for the listener (CONTEXT.md: Faithfulness). Overselling must register as a faithfulness regression in the eval.

Acceptance criteria

• framingFor returns a distinct instruction fragment per visitor type (recruiter / peer / casual / unknown)
• recruiter framing emphasizes hireable strengths + proof; peer framing emphasizes depth — asserted via angle markers in the pure-fn test
• unknown visitor → no framing fragment (neutral baseline)
• Generated answer for a framed visitor stays grounded — golden case asserts framing markers present AND faithfulness score does not regress
• Framing is applied via the generation instruction, not by post-editing the answer

Blocked by

• Slice 1: identify chip — emitted, captured, remembered (choice protocol spine) #27 (needs visitorType from the visitor profile)