diff --git a/lib/elixir/lib/module/types/descr.ex b/lib/elixir/lib/module/types/descr.ex
index 5bee8403ed..df7cf0dedd 100644
--- a/lib/elixir/lib/module/types/descr.ex
+++ b/lib/elixir/lib/module/types/descr.ex
@@ -3813,14 +3813,52 @@ defmodule Module.Types.Descr do
   defp map_update_put_domains(bdd, [], _type_fun, _force?), do: %{map: bdd}
 
   defp map_update_put_domains(bdd, domain_keys, type_fun, force?) do
-    bdd =
-      bdd_map(bdd, fn bdd_leaf(tag, fields) ->
-        bdd_leaf_new(map_update_put_domain(tag, domain_keys, type_fun, force?), fields)
-      end)
+    # The update above (bdd_map over positives and their negations) relies on the
+    # assumption that a negation only matters when it fully cancels the positive.
+    # That breaks for negations that are *disjoint* from their positive literal:
+    # such a negation removes nothing (it is redundant), but updating its domain
+    # makes it start overlapping — and thus wrongly excluding — achievable results.
+    # These redundant negations arise from non-normalized representations (e.g.
+    # (t ∩ s) ∪ (t \ s) keeps a ¬s term disjoint from t). We drop them per DNF
+    # line before updating; genuine negations are left untouched, so this is a
+    # no-op whenever the bdd carries none (preserving the fast path).
+    bdd = bdd |> map_simplify_disjoint_negations() |> bdd_map(fn bdd_leaf(tag, fields) ->
+      bdd_leaf_new(map_update_put_domain(tag, domain_keys, type_fun, force?), fields)
+    end)
 
     %{map: bdd}
   end
 
+  # Rebuilds a map bdd, dropping negations that are disjoint from (and hence
+  # redundant for) the positive literal of each DNF line. When no such negation
+  # exists, the reconstruction reproduces the original type unchanged.
+  defp map_simplify_disjoint_negations(bdd) do
+    dnf = bdd_to_dnf(bdd)
+
+    if Enum.any?(dnf, fn {_pos, negs} -> negs != [] end) do
+      Enum.reduce(dnf, :bdd_bot, fn {pos, negs}, acc ->
+        case non_empty_map_literals_intersection(pos) do
+          :empty ->
+            acc
+
+          {tag, fields} ->
+            pos_leaf = bdd_leaf_new(tag, fields)
+
+            line =
+              Enum.reduce(negs, pos_leaf, fn neg_leaf, line ->
+                if map_empty?(map_intersection(pos_leaf, neg_leaf)),
+                  do: line,
+                  else: map_difference(line, neg_leaf)
+              end)
+
+            map_union(line, acc)
+        end
+      end)
+    else
+      bdd
+    end
+  end
+
   defp map_update_put_domain(tag_or_domains, domain_keys, type_fun, force?) do
     case tag_or_domains do
       :open ->
diff --git a/lib/elixir/test/elixir/module/types/descr_test.exs b/lib/elixir/test/elixir/module/types/descr_test.exs
index 70adcf749e..153d6e6d29 100644
--- a/lib/elixir/test/elixir/module/types/descr_test.exs
+++ b/lib/elixir/test/elixir/module/types/descr_test.exs
@@ -3334,6 +3334,35 @@ defmodule Module.Types.DescrTest do
 
       assert map_put(map, atom([:k]), binary()) == {:ok, open_map(k: binary(), x: term())}
     end
+
+    test "domain put is stable across representations and keeps achievable outcomes" do
+      # A domain put over a representation carrying a redundant (disjoint)
+      # negation must not exclude achievable Map.put outcomes.
+      a =
+        closed_map(
+          a:
+            opt_negation(
+              open_map([
+                {[:port], float()},
+                {:a, closed_map([{[:reference], boolean()}, {:b, boolean()}, {:a, boolean()}])},
+                {:b, opt_difference(fun(1), tuple())}
+              ])
+            )
+        )
+
+      knife = closed_map([{[:map], opt_negation(open_tuple([fun(1)]))}])
+      a2 = opt_union(opt_intersection(a, knife), opt_difference(a, knife))
+      assert equal?(a, a2)
+      {:ok, r1} = map_put(a, atom(), knife)
+      {:ok, r2} = map_put(a2, atom(), knife)
+      assert equal?(r1, r2)
+
+      # The witness %{a: %{}, b: %{}} is achievable (put :b => %{} into %{a: %{}})
+      # and must be a member of both results.
+      witness = closed_map(a: closed_map([]), b: closed_map([]))
+      assert subtype?(witness, r1)
+      assert subtype?(witness, r2)
+    end
   end
 
   describe "disjoint" do