Problem
When the retro agent finds evidence corroborating an existing open issue, that evidence currently goes into the summary field (posted as a comment on the originating PR). The evidence is useful to the issue owner, but it's buried in an unrelated PR thread — not on the issue itself where it would inform prioritization and implementation.
Proposed change
After the retro agent identifies evidence supporting an existing issue, it should post a comment on that issue with the specific evidence found. This gives issue owners a growing body of supporting data points directly on the issue.
The comment should include:
- What PR/workflow the retro analyzed
- What specific evidence was found (concrete data points, not just "more evidence")
- Link back to the originating PR for full context
Depends on
Validation criteria
After the next 10 retro runs that find evidence for existing issues, each referenced issue should have a comment from the retro agent with the specific evidence. No "Evidence for" issues should be filed.
Problem
When the retro agent finds evidence corroborating an existing open issue, that evidence currently goes into the
summaryfield (posted as a comment on the originating PR). The evidence is useful to the issue owner, but it's buried in an unrelated PR thread — not on the issue itself where it would inform prioritization and implementation.Proposed change
After the retro agent identifies evidence supporting an existing issue, it should post a comment on that issue with the specific evidence found. This gives issue owners a growing body of supporting data points directly on the issue.
The comment should include:
Depends on
Validation criteria
After the next 10 retro runs that find evidence for existing issues, each referenced issue should have a comment from the retro agent with the specific evidence. No "Evidence for" issues should be filed.