[Examples] Avoid hardcoded label token IDs in classification.py in examples

[Ashish-Patnaik]

I noticed that in "examples/classification.py" maps labels to hardcoded token IDs:

0 -> 1294 ("No")
1 -> 3553 ("Yes")

While this works for the current tokenizer, it makes the example brittle if:

• the tokenizer vocabulary changes,
• a different Gemma variant is used, or
• the example is adapted to another model.

Additionally, the file contains minor typos:

• "grammaticaly" -> "grammatically"
• "respectivelly" -> "respectively"

Proposed Solution

1. Compute the token IDs for "Yes" and "No" dynamically using the tokenizer instance.
2. Add a small safety check to ensure that these labels map to a single token.
3. Fix the spelling errors in the prompt template and comments.

This would make the example more robust while keeping its behavior unchanged.
I would be happy to implement this change.

[sonali-kumari1]

Hi @Ashish-Patnaik,

Thanks for submitting your Pull Request to Gemma!
We value your contribution and appreciate your patience while it is reviewed.