# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/hyperpolymath/refugia.git
cd refugia
# Using Guix (recommended for reproducibility)
guix shell
# Or using toolbox/distrobox
toolbox create refugia-dev
toolbox enter refugia-dev
# Install dependencies manually
# Verify setup
just must-check # Required repository invariants
just trust-verify # Repository trust checksrefugia/
├── src/ # Source code (Perimeter 1-2)
├── lib/ # Library code (Perimeter 1-2)
├── extensions/ # Extensions (Perimeter 2)
├── plugins/ # Plugins (Perimeter 2)
├── tools/ # Tooling (Perimeter 2)
├── docs/ # Documentation (Perimeter 3)
│ ├── architecture/ # ADRs, specs (Perimeter 2)
│ └── proposals/ # RFCs (Perimeter 3)
├── examples/ # Examples (Perimeter 3)
├── spec/ # Spec tests (Perimeter 3)
├── tests/ # Test suite (Perimeter 2-3)
├── .well-known/ # Protocol files (Perimeter 1-3)
├── .github/ # GitHub config (Perimeter 1)
│ ├── CONTRIBUTING.md # This file
│ ├── ISSUE_TEMPLATE/
│ └── workflows/
├── CHANGELOG.md
├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
├── GOVERNANCE.md
├── LICENSE
├── MAINTAINERS.md
├── README.adoc
├── SECURITY.md
├── flake.nix # Nix flake (Perimeter 1)
└── Justfile # Task runner (Perimeter 1)
---
Before reporting:
- Search existing issues
- Check if it's already fixed in
main - Determine which perimeter the bug affects
When reporting:
Use the bug report template and include:
- Clear, descriptive title
- Environment details (OS, versions, toolchain)
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected vs actual behaviour
- Logs, screenshots, or minimal reproduction
Before suggesting:
- Check the roadmap if available
- Search existing issues and discussions
- Consider which perimeter the feature belongs to
When suggesting:
Use the feature request template and include:
- Problem statement (what pain point does this solve?)
- Proposed solution
- Alternatives considered
- Which perimeter this affects
Look for issues labelled:
good first issue— Simple Perimeter 3 taskshelp wanted— Community help neededdocumentation— Docs improvementsperimeter-3— Community sandbox scope
docs/short-description # Documentation (P3)
test/what-added # Test additions (P3)
feat/short-description # New features (P2)
fix/issue-number-description # Bug fixes (P2)
refactor/what-changed # Code improvements (P2)
security/what-fixed # Security fixes (P1-2)
We follow Conventional Commits:
type(scope): description
Body: what changed and why.
Footer: issue reference, e.g. Closes #123
[optional body]
[optional footer]
Every commit that reaches the default branch must be signed; a ruleset refuses unsigned pushes. Estate policy: SIGNING-POLICY.
- People and interactive agents sign with an SSH key registered on GitHub
as a signing key (
gpg.format=ssh,user.signingkey=<key>.pub,commit.gpgsign=true). The committer email must be verified on that account. - Apps, bots and workflows never
git pushlocal commits. They write through the API (createCommitOnBranchor the estatesigned-pushaction) so that GitHub signs each commit. - Merge PRs with squash. The ruleset checks every commit on the PR branch,
not just the result, so one unsigned commit blocks the merge. Re-create such a
branch with signed commits (
git cherry-pick -S) and open a new PR. Rebase-merge replays commits unsigned and is disabled.