Hi @bmcdorman, @eshort:
Was there any particular design reason for not including a std_msgs/Header field in the Faces message that the openface_ros node publishes?
In order to sync the audio data with the visual data in a single ROS node, I was thinking of using the time synchronizer from the message_filters package with an approximate time policy. But doing so requires that the messages from both topics have a header field.
Would it be appropriate to include this field in the Faces message?
Hi @bmcdorman, @eshort:
Was there any particular design reason for not including a
std_msgs/Headerfield in the Faces message that theopenface_rosnode publishes?In order to sync the audio data with the visual data in a single ROS node, I was thinking of using the time synchronizer from the message_filters package with an approximate time policy. But doing so requires that the messages from both topics have a header field.
Would it be appropriate to include this field in the Faces message?