This applies to all the clear commands, I'm just using clear_supplier as an example.
It is stated that the clear_supplier clears all supplier entries from the contact list. But for examples of command usage, example 2 uses clear_s n/Name. I feel like this could be really confusing. I thought that example usage meant that I could clear by prefixes. Instead, it cleared everything. I think instead of listing that as just an example, there should be a note or warning sign next to it to alert users that there is no clearing by prefixes. Even with the prefixes behind, clear_s n/Name will still clear everything. At the very least maybe state somewhere that there is no clearing by prefixes.
This applies to all the clear commands, I'm just using clear_supplier as an example.
It is stated that the clear_supplier clears all supplier entries from the contact list. But for examples of command usage, example 2 uses clear_s n/Name. I feel like this could be really confusing. I thought that example usage meant that I could clear by prefixes. Instead, it cleared everything. I think instead of listing that as just an example, there should be a note or warning sign next to it to alert users that there is no clearing by prefixes. Even with the prefixes behind, clear_s n/Name will still clear everything. At the very least maybe state somewhere that there is no clearing by prefixes.