Skip to content

Adopt GitHub-flavoured Markdown footnotes and fix numbering/order #6

Description

@coderabbitai

Description:
Replace ad-hoc numeric markers in the body with proper GitHub-flavoured Markdown footnote references and ensure the footnote list is ordered by first appearance.

Location: docs/lag-complexity-function-design.md, lines 1496-1752

Current issue:

  • Using bare numeric markers (e.g., 1, 3, 4) instead of proper footnote syntax
  • Footnote definitions not ordered by first reference
  • Inconsistent "accessed on" phrasing and dates
  • Current usage breaks the repository's Markdown guidelines

Required changes:

  1. Rewrite in-text numeric markers (e.g., bare 1, 3, 4) to [^1], [^2], etc.
  2. Renumber the footnote definitions in ascending order of first reference
  3. Normalise "accessed on" phrasing and dates

References:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions