Issues with using the merge tool #655
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
Hello, thanks for feedback. v14.5.0 will be generally available starting tomorrow evening. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We have used the new merge tool for a couple weeks now. We like how the new one works. There is one issue we have run into. If a revision has multiple NEW configmaps you can't just merge one and delete the other. Microservice A has the new configmap I want to merge into If I select Expected: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What product would you like to leave feedback for?
Console
What Console version are you using?
v14.4.0
Description
Merge Tool Feedback:
We've encountered two significant issues with the merge tool that are impacting our workflow:
Issue 1: Merge Failures When Selecting Source/Target
When explicitly selecting which side to take (source or target), the tool sometimes fails to merge properly and produces incorrect results.
Examples:

We selected to merge left side
It merged leaving the same property twice

Issue 2: Unintended Deletion of New Files During Merge
Scenario: Multiple teams work in the same project.
Problem: The merge tool defaults to deleting newly added resources that don't exist in main (the merge source). This behavior is counterintuitive and easy to miss, leading to accidental deletion of intentionally added files.
Expected behavior: New files in the target branch should be preserved by default when merging into a revision.
Both issues pose risks to our multi-team workflow and would benefit from improved handling or clearer warnings.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions