Just curious, what do you think of `google/magika`?

[vanyauhalin]

https://github.com/google/magika

[jfcherng]

Magika supports less "programming languages" but it's more accurate if the actual language is in its supported list. E.g., lua / haskell / toml are not supported. Magika doesn't distinguish between JavaScript/TypeScript.

But at the same time, it looks like magika plans to update their model to include more formats. https://github.com/google/magika/blob/158dbda7cb25fad9236c7234c69778003f2d9970/docs/faq.md#q-why-does-magika-support-only-100-content-types-and-not-many-more

[Guanran928]

E.g., lua / haskell / toml are not supported. Magika doesn't distinguish between JavaScript/TypeScript.

https://github.com/google/magika/blob/main/assets/models/standard_v3_3/README.md

Seems like those languages are supported now, with ~200 total supported languages.

[jfcherng]

I have switched to magika in my use case actually.