docs(pm-dispatch): a card that narrows a published accept set is Clause-② no, stays in its lane and owes one contract-review-tier review before the queue (#22223)

Part of #22167

Clause-②: no

## What changes

`.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md` 〈派发〉 gains
one bullet directly under the Clause-② lines — after
「条款②只指已发布契约面,拉回已声明契约不触它;卡面复述仍是条款②。」 and before 「删已发布契约文本本就否定的误拒本身是
`no`;…」:

```text
- 收窄已发布接受集的卡是 `Clause-②: no`,不移车道;入队前欠一次契约复审档复核。
```

It states the three facts the director's ruling (letter C, comment
6053791774 on the card) settles: a card that narrows a published accept
set (refuses tomorrow what passes today) is `Clause-②: no`, does not
move lanes, and owes one contract-review-tier review before the queue.
The Clause-② definition lines — 「`Clause-②: yes | no`
恰这两种拼写,恒英文机器判据;判据:本卡放宽接受集或扩大公开面吗。」 and 「强制条款②:放宽接受集或扩大公开面的卡默认判断档施工;命中即
spec 车道的活。」 — are unchanged byte for byte (re-read on `origin/main` at
`7d7943dd0d`, lines 67 and 101).

The ruling's gloss 「明天拒绝今天还能通过的」 is not inside the line: with it the
bullet measured 143 bytes against the ratchet's 120-byte per-line budget
(`check:pm-skill-ratchet` went red on exactly that line), and wrapping
it would cost a second line the file's ceiling does not have. 「收窄接受集」
reads against the neighbouring 「放宽接受集」 without a gloss; the gloss stays
in this PR and on the card.

No issue number enters the operational text (`pnpm
check:pm-skill-id-lint` green).

## Line ratchet (`pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet`)

- Ceiling for this file: 183. Count on `origin/main`: 183 (headroom 0).
Count after this PR: 183. The ceiling row is untouched.
- The new line is paid by deleting one line the same file restates —
〈收集〉 「探活是每轮巡检的固定动作;完成通知不可靠,缺席什么都不证明。」 Where its content survives, all in
the same 〈收集〉 section: the probe as a fixed patrol action is step 「③
已派发未回报的 dev 逐个发状态询问;派发后 ~45 分钟无远程产出即到门槛。」 (and 「已有远程分支/PR 不豁免探针。」);
"absence proves nothing" is 「⛔ 永不把没收到失败通知读作还在跑」 in the section's second
bullet and 「⑤ 判据永远取正向证据:分支、PR、报告、探活回包。」.
- No re-wrap anywhere: the diff is exactly +1 / -1 lines, the new line
is 108 bytes, the widest-table-row pin stays at 0.

## The card's remainder (not in this PR)

The `--tier` note in `scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs` (the string "a card
that changes contract accept/reject behaviour or widens the public
surface owes a contract-review-tier REVIEW too …") is reworded to the
same meaning when #22060 W3 unfreezes that file; the file is frozen
(ruling 208 R6, read as whole-file) and this PR does not touch it.
#22167 stays open for that remainder. #22135 was already amended to
`Clause-②: no` by triage; nothing more there.

## 维护者速读(草稿)

**改了什么**:PM 派发规则文件 `execution-duties.md`
的〈派发〉节,在条款②那四行之下加一句:收窄已发布接受集的卡(明天开始拒绝今天还能通过的元数据)是 `Clause-②:
no`,不换车道;入队前要过一次契约复审档复核。条款②本身的定义一字未动。为付行数棘轮(该文件 183 行、余量
0),删掉了〈收集〉节一句本文件别处已经说过的话(探活是固定巡检动作、通知缺席不证明什么),它的内容仍在同节的 ③ 与 ⑤ 两条里。

**为什么改**:两段 PM 规则对"收紧"卡给出两个答案——一段说不欠复审、留本车道,另一段说欠复审且归 spec
车道;哪个席位先读到哪段,决定了客户看到的那次"被拒绝"有没有人按契约档看过。裁决(批次 290 第 5 项,字母
C)拆成两问:条款②只问"扩不扩面"(定车道与施工档);收紧的卡另加一句,欠一次契约复审档复核、不移车道。本 PR
落第一半;`dispatch-gates.mjs` 里 `--tier` 注释那一半等该文件解冻后随 #22060 W3 落地。


**风险与代价(含回滚)**:只改一行协议文本,不改任何闸门脚本与机制,不加标签不加链;代价是每张收紧已发布接受集的卡入队前多一次契约档复核。回滚
= revert 本 PR,无数据与行为残留。

**席位意见**:

**你要做的**:无需操作——Tier S 面,skills 席席内契约复审档复核 PASS 后翻 ready
入队;若不同意这句话的措辞,在卡上留一句即可。

## Verification (tree `869d7896df`)

Derived with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo
objectstack-ai/objectstack` on this tree (17 families: 9 matched by
path, 8 whole-tree), every command run in the foreground with its exit
code captured before any pipe, and reconciled with `--ran`:

| family | exit | verdict line |
|:--|:--|:--|
| `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet` | 0 | `execution-duties.md is 183 lines
(ceiling 183; headroom 0)`; 157 self-test cases pass |
| `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint` | 0 | `34 file(s) clean (pattern
/#[0-9]{3,}/g)` |
| `pnpm check:skill-frame-sync` | 0 | one declared copy coherent; 90
markdown files scanned for undeclared copies |
| `node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test` | 0 | all 26
cases passed |
| `pnpm check:nul-bytes` | 0 | scanned 10178 text files, no raw ASCII
control bytes |
| `node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs` (+ `--self-test`) | 0
/ 0 | green |
| `node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:agent-test-spelling` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:doc-authoring` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:driver-memory-census` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:gitlink-declared` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:pm-governed-merges` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:refd-timer-probe` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm check:watch-hint-literal` | 0 | green |
| `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` |
3 then 0 | first run exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET:
`@objectstack/formula` and `@objectstack/lint` not built — nothing
measured); after `turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula
--filter=@objectstack/lint` under the verify lock, rerun exit 0: `✓
check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s)
across 468 files / 1384 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.`
|

Not derived, not run: the package builds and type-checks (`.claude/**`
is outside every package), the 53 artifact-roster families (silent on
every card), the 11 wide-population families and the type-check lanes —
CI owns those. No changeset: `.claude/**` publishes nothing from any
released package, so this PR carries `skip-changeset`.

The ratchet's red-then-green sequence is recorded on the branch: the
first commit carried the 143-byte line (ratchet red on L105), the second
shortened it to 108 bytes (ratchet green at 183/183).

## Acceptance notes

- Observation, not filed: 〈收集〉 「标记两种拼写等效(HTML 注释形、首行 `os-dev-report`)」
keeps the HTML-comment spelling readable on the collecting side while
the dev-side rules call that spelling bad; a read-side tolerance, no
defect class, left as is.
- The PM-suggested closing clause 「席内达档或至档子代理皆可」 was not added: it
restates 「契约三面自审资格按车道:spec/skills 席达档席内审;未达档 ⛔ 不自审,起隔离达档子代理。」 and the
ruling fixes three facts, not four.

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01CXydFDyiQwNbGFkmwrcRQq)_

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: objectstack-fleet[bot]

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md

@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@
 - 条款②判据即代裁的机械边界测试与 `references/lanes/spec.md` 席内分派判据,⛔ 不另抄。
 - 负边界:运行时权限/安全行为变更不是条款②,归人工地板安全/权限边界类。
 - 条款②只指已发布契约面,拉回已声明契约不触它;卡面复述仍是条款②。
+- 收窄已发布接受集的卡是 `Clause-②: no`,不移车道;入队前欠一次契约复审档复核。
 - 删已发布契约文本本就否定的误拒本身是 `no`;该 `no` 须引那段文本,缺引即读作缺申报。
 - 引文不符 ⇒ 降为 `yes`;裁决守卫、安全拒绝、失败关闭是刻意拒绝非误拒,删之 `yes`。
 - 错误码已发布面 = `ERROR_CODE_LEDGER`/`StandardErrorCode`:新码恒 `yes`,无门亦然,漏登即缺口。
@@ -149,7 +150,6 @@
 - 收集先扫 GitHub(两种模式),标记评论在 = 报告完整;评论与返回消息皆无才进探活/判死。
 - 标记两种拼写等效(HTML 注释形、首行 `os-dev-report`);⛔ 永不把没收到失败通知读作还在跑。
 - 报告点名 PR ⇒ 会话席当即 `subscribe_pr_activity` 并记座位贴;中继开的 PR 永不自动挂会话。
-- 探活是每轮巡检的固定动作;完成通知不可靠,缺席什么都不证明。
 - ① 巡检首动作 `list_triggers` 确认 Routine 启用,在飞重挂加速器;唤醒归 Routine,漏挂不断链。
 - ② 在飞期间主巡检间隔 ≤45 分钟,待命期 60–70;节奏维护者明示可改。
 - ③ 已派发未回报的 dev 逐个发状态询问;派发后 ~45 分钟无远程产出即到门槛。