diff --git a/‎.changeset/21350-my-pending-position-address.md‎
Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions b/‎.changeset/21350-my-pending-position-address.md‎
Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
diff --git a/‎content/docs/automation/approvals.mdx‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 4 deletions b/‎content/docs/automation/approvals.mdx‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 4 deletions
diff --git a/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approval-service.test.ts‎
Lines changed: 136 additions & 0 deletions b/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approval-service.test.ts‎
Lines changed: 136 additions & 0 deletions
diff --git a/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approval-service.ts‎
Lines changed: 38 additions & 15 deletions b/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approval-service.ts‎
Lines changed: 38 additions & 15 deletions
diff --git a/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approver-address.test.ts‎
Lines changed: 47 additions & 0 deletions b/‎packages/plugins/plugin-approvals/src/approver-address.test.ts‎
Lines changed: 47 additions & 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+'@objectstack/plugin-approvals': patch
+---
+
+The approvals inbox's "My Pending" now lists a request routed to a position for the users who hold that position, whichever spelling of the position address the client asks for
+
+Clause-②: no
+
+A request whose approver position nobody held when it opened keeps the literal `position:<name>` slot. A user staffed into that position afterwards could already decide it, by naming `position:<name>` as the actor. `resolveActor` admits a holder under `position:<name>` and under `role:<name>` (the deprecated pre-rename spelling) as the caller's own identity, but the decision's slot test is literal: on that slot, `role:<name>` or no actor at all answers 403. The list read did not agree with either half.
+
+- `GET /api/v1/approvals/requests?approverId=…` matched each value literally. The stock console sends `role:<name>` for every position the session carries, so the request never appeared in "My Pending". A position address now matches under both spellings `resolveActor` admits a holder under, and no others. A `team:`, `org_membership_level:` or bare-name value still matches only itself.
+- The participant gate behind every approvals read counted a "current approver" by user id alone. A holder of the position who neither submitted the request nor holds admin standing got an empty list under both spellings and a `404` on `GET /api/v1/approvals/requests/:id`, though their approve call naming `position:<name>` succeeded. The gate now also counts the slot addresses of every position on the caller's server-resolved context. A request becomes visible only to someone who can decide it.
+- The decision routes are unchanged. They admit exactly the identities they admitted before, and a pin compares them against the previous predicate.
+
+A caller who sent the stored `position:<name>` spelling and was already the submitter or an admin sees no change.
@@ -386,7 +386,8 @@ and nothing can move it, so the run parks forever.
 
 The approver's surface is the **Approvals Inbox** — in the stock console, the
 **Approvals** entry in the account menu. It lists what is waiting on the current
-user (`status = pending`, `pending_approvers` containing them) and it is the only
+user (`status = pending`, `pending_approvers` containing them — their user id,
+or the `position:<name>` literal of a position they hold) and it is the only
 surface that carries the **decision actions**: approve, reject, return, reassign,
 request info, delegate, remind, override.
 
@@ -415,15 +416,19 @@ curl -b cookies.txt \
 `approverId` accepts a user id, an email, or a `<type>:<value>` approver literal
 (`position:finance_manager` — the form an entry falls back to when it resolves
 to no users) — and takes several values (comma-separated or repeated) to cover
-a person's identities in one call.
+a person's identities in one call. A position literal matches under both
+spellings the service admits a holder of that position under as their own
+identity: `position:<name>`, and the deprecated pre-rename prefix the stock
+console still sends — so either one finds the same requests.
 Other filters: `status`, `object`, `recordId`, `submitterId`, `q`, `limit`,
 `offset`.
 
 <Callout type="warn">
 **`approverId` is a filter, not authorization.** What you may see is decided
 separately: a request is visible to its **participants** — the submitter, a
-current approver, and anyone who has already acted on it (a past approver whose
-slot has moved on, a commenter). So omitting `approverId` returns *your*
+current approver (counting anyone who holds the position a `position:<name>`
+slot names, since the decision routes admit them under it), and anyone who has
+already acted on it (a past approver whose slot has moved on, a commenter). So omitting `approverId` returns *your*
 requests, not every request in the tenant. Admins with override authority
 (`admin_full_access`, or `organization_admin` within their org) see all of them
 — that is what the "all requests" view is for.
 
@@ -3587,6 +3587,142 @@ describe('ApprovalService — participant visibility (#3590)', () => {
   });
 });
 
+// ── "My Pending" reads the acting path's position addresses (#21350) ───
+//
+// A request routed to a position nobody held when it opened keeps the literal
+// `position:<p>` slot (a 15.x-era one reads `role:<p>`), and the console asks
+// "My Pending" under `role:<p>`. `resolveActor` has always admitted a holder of
+// `p` under either spelling, but the list filter matched the caller's
+// `approverId` literally and the participant gate keyed on the user id alone —
+// so the request was missing from the inbox of the very user who could decide
+// it. All three now read ONE equivalence (`approver-address.ts`).
+describe('ApprovalService — "My Pending" position addresses (#21350)', () => {
+  const svcFor = (engine: any) => {
+    let n = 0;
+    return new ApprovalService({ engine, clock: { now: () => new Date(1757000000000 + (n++) * 1000) } });
+  };
+  /** A signed-in caller whose server-resolved `positions` are `positions`. */
+  const holding = (userId: string, positions: unknown[]) =>
+    ({ userId, tenantId: 't1', positions, permissions: [] }) as any;
+  /** Staffed into the routed position; neither the submitter nor an admin. */
+  const REVIEWER = holding('u_reviewer', ['sales_manager']);
+  /** Holds a position — just not the routed one. */
+  const BYSTANDER = holding('u_bystander', ['finance']);
+  const SPELLINGS = ['role:sales_manager', 'position:sales_manager'] as const;
+
+  /** Routed to a position the fake directory staffs with nobody → a literal slot. */
+  const routedTo = (type: 'position' | 'role', value = 'sales_manager') => ({
+    object: 'opportunity', recordId: 'opp1', runId: 'run_1', nodeId: 'approve_step',
+    flowName: 'deal_approval',
+    config: { approvers: [{ type: type as any, value }], behavior: 'first_response' as const },
+    record: { id: 'opp1', amount: 100 },
+  });
+  /** Open the scene. An empty slate under the default policy still opens a row; an auto-approval is a broken scene. */
+  const open = async (svc: ApprovalService, input: ReturnType<typeof routedTo>) => {
+    const out = await svc.openNodeRequest(input, CTX);
+    if (!('id' in out)) throw new Error('scene did not open: the empty slate auto-approved');
+    return out;
+  };
+
+  it('a holder of the position finds the request under EITHER spelling — list, count and the request itself', async () => {
+    const engine = makeFakeEngine();
+    const svc = svcFor(engine);
+    const req = await open(svc, routedTo('position')); // submitter u1
+    expect(req.pending_approvers).toEqual(['position:sales_manager']);
+
+    for (const spelling of SPELLINGS) {
+      // The console's own identity list: user id, then the position address.
+      const filter = { status: 'pending' as const, approverId: ['u_reviewer', spelling] };
+      const listed = await svc.listRequests(filter, REVIEWER);
+      expect(listed.map(r => r.id), `listed under '${spelling}'`).toEqual([req.id]);
+      expect(await svc.countRequests(filter, REVIEWER), `counted under '${spelling}'`).toBe(1);
+    }
+    expect(await svc.getRequest(req.id, REVIEWER)).not.toBeNull();
+  });
+
+  it('a 15.x-era `role:` slot is found under the `position:` spelling too', async () => {
+    const engine = makeFakeEngine();
+    const svc = svcFor(engine);
+    // `role` is the deprecated approver type; its literal keeps the authored spelling.
+    const req = await open(svc, routedTo('role'));
+    expect(req.pending_approvers).toEqual(['role:sales_manager']);
+
+    for (const spelling of SPELLINGS) {
+      const listed = await svc.listRequests({ status: 'pending', approverId: ['u_reviewer', spelling] }, REVIEWER);
+      expect(listed.map(r => r.id), `listed under '${spelling}'`).toEqual([req.id]);
+    }
+  });
+
+  it('negative control: a user who does not hold the position sees nothing, under either spelling', async () => {
+    const engine = makeFakeEngine();
+    const svc = svcFor(engine);
+    const req = await open(svc, routedTo('position'));
+
+    for (const spelling of SPELLINGS) {
+      const filter = { status: 'pending' as const, approverId: ['u_bystander', spelling] };
+      expect(await svc.listRequests(filter, BYSTANDER), `listed under '${spelling}'`).toEqual([]);
+      expect(await svc.countRequests(filter, BYSTANDER), `counted under '${spelling}'`).toBe(0);
+    }
+    expect(await svc.listRequests(undefined, BYSTANDER)).toEqual([]);
+    expect(await svc.getRequest(req.id, BYSTANDER)).toBeNull();
+  });
+
+  it('negative control: a spelling the acting path does not admit folds onto nothing', async () => {
+    const engine = makeFakeEngine();
+    const svc = svcFor(engine);
+    const req = await open(svc, routedTo('position'));
+
+    // SYS sees every row, so a miss here is the FILTER's verdict alone.
+    expect((await svc.listRequests({ approverId: 'role:sales_manager' }, SYS)).map(r => r.id)).toEqual([req.id]);
+    for (const address of ['team:sales_manager', 'org_membership_level:sales_manager', 'sales_manager']) {
+      expect(await svc.listRequests({ approverId: address }, SYS), `'${address}' must not fold`).toEqual([]);
+    }
+  });
+
+  it('the acting path is unchanged: the holder decides under the stored spelling, the bystander is refused', async () => {
+    const engine = makeFakeEngine();
+    const svc = svcFor(engine);
+    const req = await open(svc, routedTo('position'));
+
+    await expect(
+      svc.decideNode(req.id, { decision: 'approve', actorId: 'position:sales_manager' }, BYSTANDER),
+    ).rejects.toThrow(/^FORBIDDEN: cannot act as 'position:sales_manager'/);
+
+    const out = await svc.decideNode(req.id, { decision: 'approve', actorId: 'position:sales_manager' }, REVIEWER);
+    expect(out.finalized).toBe(true);
+    expect(out.request.status).toBe('approved');
+  });
+
+  // `resolveActor` must admit EXACTLY what it admitted before the equivalence
+  // moved into `approver-address.ts`. The oracle is the pre-extraction
+  // predicate, verbatim; the matrix crosses both spellings with near misses and
+  // with position names that contain a prefix themselves.
+  it('resolveActor admits exactly the identities the pre-extraction predicate admitted', async () => {
+    const svc = svcFor(makeFakeEngine());
+    const preExtraction = (named: string, positions: unknown[]) =>
+      positions.some((position) => named === `position:${position}` || named === `role:${position}`);
+    const NAMED = [
+      'position:cfo', 'role:cfo', 'team:cfo', 'org_membership_level:cfo', 'positions:cfo', 'Position:cfo',
+      'cfo', 'position:', 'role:', 'position:role:cfo', 'role:position:cfo', 'position:cfo ', 'u_other',
+    ];
+    const POSITION_SETS: unknown[][] = [[], ['cfo'], ['finance', 'cfo'], ['role:cfo'], ['position:cfo'], [''], [7]];
+    let admittedCount = 0;
+    for (const positions of POSITION_SETS) {
+      for (const named of NAMED.concat(['position:7', 'role:7'])) {
+        const admitted = await (svc as any).resolveActor(named, holding('u_caller', positions)).then(
+          (actor: string) => { expect(actor).toBe(named); return true; },
+          (err: Error) => { expect(err.message).toMatch(/^FORBIDDEN: cannot act as /); return false; },
+        );
+        expect(admitted, `named '${named}' with positions ${JSON.stringify(positions)}`)
+          .toBe(preExtraction(named, positions));
+        if (admitted) admittedCount++;
+      }
+    }
+    // Both arms of the matrix are exercised — not a sweep of refusals only.
+    expect(admittedCount).toBeGreaterThan(5);
+  });
+});
+
 // ── The ordering invariant the dead-run sweep rests on (#3456) ─────────
 //
 // `releaseDeadRunRequests` recalls a PENDING request whose owning run has
 
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ import {
   type ApproverOrgScopeDeps,
   type ApproverOrgScopeEngine,
 } from './approver-org-scope.js';
+// The ONE spelling equivalence for a position's slot address — read by the
+// acting path, the "My Pending" filter and the participant gate alike.
+import { equivalentApproverAddresses, positionAddresses } from './approver-address.js';
 import {
   redactSnapshot,
   resolveReadableSnapshotFields,
@@ -1529,10 +1532,12 @@ export class ApprovalService implements IApprovalService {
     // Named something else — allow it ONLY if the server can prove the caller
     // holds that identity. `positions` is resolved by the shared authz resolver
     // (never client-supplied); `role:` is the ADR-0090 D3 deprecated spelling
-    // that 15.x-era slots and the Console's own identity list still carry.
+    // that 15.x-era slots and the Console's own identity list still carry. The
+    // spellings come from `positionAddresses` — the one equivalence the list
+    // filter and the participant gate read too (`approver-address.ts`).
     const named = String(actorId);
     for (const position of context.positions ?? []) {
-      if (named === `position:${position}` || named === `role:${position}`) return named;
+      if (positionAddresses(position).includes(named)) return named;
     }
     // Email last — it costs a read, so only when nothing cheaper matched.
     if (named.includes('@') && await this.callerHasEmail(uid, named)) return named;
@@ -6228,17 +6233,26 @@ export class ApprovalService implements IApprovalService {
    * `sys_approval_approver` index — the indexed replacement for the old
    * in-memory CSV scan, and what makes approver-filtered pagination correct
    * past any scan window (issue #1745). A request matches when ANY of the
-   * caller's identities (user id / email / role:<r>) holds a pending slot.
-   * Returns null when the filter is absent (callers skip the id constraint).
+   * caller's identities (user id / email / a position address) holds a pending
+   * slot. Returns null when the filter is absent (callers skip the id
+   * constraint).
+   *
+   * A position address matches under EVERY spelling of that position — the
+   * index stores the slot as it was written (`position:<p>` for a slot opened
+   * on an unstaffed position, `role:<p>` for a 15.x-era one), while a client
+   * may ask under either. The spellings come from `equivalentApproverAddresses`,
+   * the same equivalence `resolveActor` admits a caller under; ⛔ never a
+   * second fold written here.
    */
   private async approverRequestIds(
     targets: string[],
     tenantOrg: string | null,
   ): Promise<string[] | null> {
     if (!targets.length) return null;
-    const where: any = targets.length === 1
-      ? { approver: targets[0] }
-      : { approver: { $in: targets } };
+    const addresses = [...new Set(targets.flatMap(equivalentApproverAddresses))];
+    const where: any = addresses.length === 1
+      ? { approver: addresses[0] }
+      : { approver: { $in: addresses } };
     if (tenantOrg) where.organization_id = tenantOrg;
     const rows = await this.engine.find('sys_approval_approver', {
       where, fields: ['request_id'],
@@ -6269,12 +6283,19 @@ export class ApprovalService implements IApprovalService {
    * commenter). Admins with override authority keep the unrestricted view the
    * "all requests" console surface depends on.
    *
-   * Keying on the concrete user id is sufficient rather than an approximation:
-   * position/team/manager/field approvers are resolved to concrete user ids at
-   * open time, and the `type:value` literal is only the fallback for a spec
-   * that resolved to NOBODY — a slot no one can act on either way (`can_act`
-   * is a plain membership test over the resolved ids). So this cannot hide a
-   * request from someone who could actually act on it.
+   * "Current approver" means a pending slot the caller could ACT under, which
+   * is wider than their concrete user id: position/team/manager/field
+   * approvers are resolved to concrete user ids at open time, but a position
+   * that nobody held at open time leaves the literal `position:<p>` slot (and a
+   * 15.x-era slot reads `role:<p>`), and `resolveActor` lets a caller who holds
+   * `p` — server-resolved `context.positions`, never client-supplied — act
+   * under either spelling. Keying on the user id alone hid exactly those
+   * requests from the people who could decide them: absent from "My Pending"
+   * under every spelling the client asked for, `404` on the request itself,
+   * while the approve call succeeded. So the probe asks for the user id AND
+   * every address of every position the caller holds, from the same
+   * `positionAddresses` equivalence the acting path reads — no request becomes
+   * visible here that the caller could not decide.
    */
   private async visibleRequestIds(
     context: ExecutionContext,
@@ -6301,8 +6322,10 @@ export class ApprovalService implements IApprovalService {
 
     try {
       // Current approver — via the normalized index, so every identity form
-      // the write path recorded is covered.
-      for (const id of (await this.approverRequestIds([uid], tenantOrg)) ?? []) ids.add(id);
+      // the write path recorded is covered: the user id, and every slot
+      // address of a position the caller holds (see the doc block above).
+      const actingAddresses = [uid, ...(context.positions ?? []).flatMap(positionAddresses)];
+      for (const id of (await this.approverRequestIds(actingAddresses, tenantOrg)) ?? []) ids.add(id);
 
       const orgWhere = tenantOrg ? { organization_id: tenantOrg } : {};
       add(
 
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2026 ObjectStack. Licensed under the Apache-2.0 license.
+
+/**
+ * The one position-address equivalence (`approver-address.ts`).
+ *
+ * Three readers take it from here — `resolveActor`, the "My Pending" filter
+ * (`approverRequestIds`) and the participant gate (`visibleRequestIds`) — so
+ * these pins are on the equivalence itself: exactly the two spellings the
+ * acting path has always admitted, and nothing else folds. The service-level
+ * pins (both spellings list, the acting path unchanged) live beside the other
+ * participant-visibility pins in `approval-service.test.ts`.
+ */
+
+import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
+import { equivalentApproverAddresses, positionAddresses } from './approver-address.js';
+
+describe('approver-address — the position-address equivalence', () => {
+  it('spells a position under exactly the two prefixes the acting path admits, canonical first', () => {
+    expect(positionAddresses('sales_manager')).toEqual(['position:sales_manager', 'role:sales_manager']);
+  });
+
+  it('folds either spelling of a position onto both', () => {
+    const both = ['position:sales_manager', 'role:sales_manager'];
+    expect(equivalentApproverAddresses('position:sales_manager')).toEqual(both);
+    expect(equivalentApproverAddresses('role:sales_manager')).toEqual(both);
+  });
+
+  it('splits on the FIRST accepted prefix only, so a position name may itself contain a colon', () => {
+    expect(equivalentApproverAddresses('role:position:x')).toEqual(['position:position:x', 'role:position:x']);
+    expect(equivalentApproverAddresses('position:role:x')).toEqual(['position:role:x', 'role:role:x']);
+  });
+
+  // The negative control: a fold wider than the acting path would list
+  // requests the caller cannot decide.
+  it.each([
+    ['a user id', 'u_reviewer'],
+    ['an email', 'reviewer@example.com'],
+    ['a team literal', 'team:sales_manager'],
+    ['a membership-level literal', 'org_membership_level:sales_manager'],
+    ['a department literal', 'department:sales_manager'],
+    ['a near-miss prefix', 'positions:sales_manager'],
+    ['a differently-cased prefix', 'Position:sales_manager'],
+    ['a prefix not at the start', 'x-role:sales_manager'],
+  ])('treats %s as equivalent only to itself', (_label, address) => {
+    expect(equivalentApproverAddresses(address)).toEqual([address]);
+  });
+});