docs(core): the quoted 2026-09-08 ruling cites the ADR amendment that records it verbatim

ADR-0131's 2026-09-17 amendment quotes the same sentence verbatim and
untranslated, so the ADR comes before the commit as its anchor.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DDZNkDVwPQnevTFcYE47H3
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: claude

packages/core/src/security/resolve-authz-context.ts

@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ export async function resolveUserAuthzGrants(
   // the flag exists rather than a plain deletion. Under `single` — the DEFAULT, what
   // a deployment that configured no tenancy at all resolves to — `bootstrapPlatformAdmin`
   // MINTS this very row for the first human user, and that promotion is ruled correct
-  // and unchanged (Choice 4A, #11974; maintainer 2026-09-08, recorded in commit 74832b68f, verbatim: "The
+  // and unchanged (Choice 4A, #11974; maintainer 2026-09-08, recorded in ADR-0131's 2026-09-17 amendment, verbatim: "The
   // rest of Choice 4A (#11974, 2026-08-25) stands: retiring the walled write must not
   // retire the `single` one"). A development environment started for a moment cannot be
   // asked to declare an administrator first, so deleting the row route for every posture