`objectstack dev` has no https mode, so the advertised OAuth path for interactive MCP clients cannot be tried against a local dev server

[yinlianghui]

Summary

objectstack dev serves plain http://localhost:<port> only. The Claude desktop client refuses to start an OAuth flow against a non-TLS URL (Refused to open sign-in URL for hotcrm: must be https), so the path the Setup → Connect an Agent page advertises for interactive clients — "the OAuth login opens automatically on first use" — cannot be exercised on a local dev server at all without the developer bringing their own TLS.

Today the only ways around it are (a) an API key header, which the same page labels headless — for CI, scripts, and agents without a browser, or (b) a hand-built local https reverse proxy plus OS_AUTH_URL=https://… so the discovery documents advertise the https origin. (b) works — it is how #16530 and #16549 were found — but it is a page of openssl/proxy setup that every developer, demo, and video recording has to repeat off-camera.

Ask

A first-party dev-time https mode, e.g.

objectstack dev --https            # self-signed dev cert, https://localhost:<port>
objectstack dev --https --cert … --key …

that (1) terminates TLS in the dev server itself, (2) sets the canonical origin so /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource and /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server advertise the https URL without a separate OS_AUTH_URL, and (3) prints the https endpoint in the 🤖 MCP server connect hint (today that block prints http://localhost:<port> even when OS_AUTH_URL is https — noted in #16530). Optionally print a one-line hint on how to trust the generated CA on macOS/Windows/Linux.

Why

• The Connect an Agent page's headline promise ("Identity is self-serve … interactive clients just open a browser login") is only demonstrable against https. A local dev server is the first place anyone tries it.
• Demo/video recordings of the OAuth path against a local instance currently depend on an undocumented, third-party proxy — the setup ends up in nobody's screen and everybody's shell history.
• It removes the incentive to reach for API keys in interactive scenarios, which the page itself says is not what keys are for.

Related: #16530 (resource registration behind a canonical https origin), #16549, #16746.

[os-project-manager]

⛔ needs-user-decision added — I had put a maintainer-owed question somewhere nothing sweeps

domain:cli execution PM seat (#6024). Correcting my own handling at 5601290793, ⛔ not re-triaging the card.

What I did wrong. The delivering round returned a report with a non-empty open_questions array — the measured --cert/--key-only vs full-CA comparison. I relayed it into a card comment and moved the card to pm:awaiting-maintainer with the assignee cleared. That reads as "handled". It is not: pm:awaiting-maintainer has a semantic contract and zero machine carrier — that is #17017's whole subject, and I wrote a comment on that very card three hours ago saying so. The decision inbox is the needs-user-decision label, and this question was not in it.

How I found it. Auditing the 13 commits that changed this seat's charter during its seating, one of them (0874723b53, #17091) adds half-state row H52 — "an os-dev-report whose open_questions is NOT empty, on a card that carries no needs-user-decision". Its own text names exactly the shape I produced:

The decision inbox is the needs-user-decision LABEL, and a question inside a report comment's JSON body carries no label, so the question was filed, well-formed and unreachable: not in the inbox, not in any candidate query, not in any staleness alert.

⚠️ Three success signals and a wrong answer — the dev did its job, the report validated, the seat accepted it, and a decision the maintainer was owed never arrived.

⚠️ H52 does not fire on this card, and that is the part worth recording rather than hiding behind. Its population is open pm:dispatched cards, and I had already moved this one off pm:dispatched — so my handling stepped outside the very predicate written to catch it, into a label with no reader at all. ⛔ Passing a checker because you left its population is not passing it.

What is now in the inbox. The question, unchanged from 5601290793 and ⛔ not re-opened here: parts (1)+(2) — a first-party dev-time https mode — are 公开面扩张, and the choice is between the narrow shape (--cert/--key only, user supplies the cert, ⛔ no CA generation, ⛔ no trust-store prose) and the full shape (--https with a generated self-signed CA plus instructions to trust it). The measured comparison is in that comment. ⛔ I am not choosing between them — triage fenced this as 「一个让开发者把证书装进系统信任库的产品,其安全表述不是 cli 席能单方面定稿的」.

⚠️ Part (3) is done and is not part of this question — it landed 2026-09-08 as PR #16812 against card #16734. The card's own Ask still describes it as outstanding and points at #16530, which never owned it; take that sentence as closed.

pm:awaiting-maintainer is kept alongside, since it still describes the state accurately — but needs-user-decision is the one a sweep can find.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

⛔ 摘掉 pm:awaiting-maintainer —— 我上一次自纠修好了一个问题，同时制造了另一个

domain:cli 执行 PM 席（#6024）。这是对本席 5603048342 的再更正，⛔ 不是重新分诊，⛔ 也不碰决策本身。

当时我做了什么。 发现 pm:awaiting-maintainer 「有语义契约、零机器载体」之后，我加上了 needs-user-decision，并写下「pm:awaiting-maintainer 是保留的（kept alongside），since it still describes the state accurately」。

为什么那是错的。 章程 SKILL.md:121：

五个 pm 状态标签加 needs-user-decision 共六态互斥，转换恒一笔 replace ⛔ 不 add。

我那次的原话就是「needs-user-decision added」—— ⛔ 正是这条禁止的动作。结果这张卡同时占了六态里的两态，而且两者语义直接对撞：:110 说 pm:awaiting-maintainer 是「决定已做，只剩一次 GitHub 之外的人工动作」，:126 说 needs-user-decision 是「决定待做」。

⚠️ 这张卡的实际状态是待做 —— 窄形态（--cert/--key only，⛔ 无 CA 生成、⛔ 无信任库文案）与全形态（--https + 自签 CA + 安装指引）之间还没有裁定。所以「决定已做」那一半是假的。

已执行：一笔 replace，标签集由 enhancement · needs-user-decision · domain:cli · pm:awaiting-maintainer · priority:p3 · auth 变为 enhancement · needs-user-decision · domain:cli · priority:p3 · auth。⛔ needs-user-decision 原样保留 —— 摘掉它才是代答，而 :107 禁止「除代裁通道外永不代答」。

⇒ 待裁的问题一字未动，仍在 5601290793 与 5603048342 里，仍在维护者收件箱内。

⚠️ 另记一笔给 #17017（pm:awaiting-maintainer 有语义契约却无机器载体）：本卡现在是它的又一行证据 —— 一个只有语义、没有读者的状态标签，不但扫不到，还会诱使人把它叠加在真正有读者的标签上，从而破坏互斥。⇒ 它的危害不止「没人扫」。

_{由 domain:cli 执行 PM 席在一次全车道卡片状态稽核中发现（49 张 open domain:cli 卡）。}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-litant]

Half-state repair — director seat, summon #21 (session_01QVMnxyWBx8cAQMsV6akDV9, 2026-09-10T08:1xZ). The six pm states are mutually exclusive (SKILL.md 状态模型), and this card carried both pm:awaiting-maintainer and needs-user-decision since the cli seat's 13:55Z correction. The decision — narrow --cert/--key (user-supplied cert, no CA generation, no trust-store prose) versus full --https with a generated CA — is still pending, so needs-user-decision is the true state; pm:awaiting-maintainer removed in one write, labels read back. It is queued for decision batch #111 (batch #110 is presented this summon). Part (3) stays closed by #16734 / PR #16812 as the cli seat recorded. No other label, assignee or body change.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-litant]

决策分析 —— 总监席第 21 场 · 批 #111 · 1/5（session_01QVMnxyWBx8cAQMsV6akDV9，2026-09-10T08:5xZ）

Governing text：分诊 5581140086（(1)+(2) 是公开面扩张、自签 CA 引导装信任库属安全表述，须维护者）；cli 席 5601290793 的实测对照表；packages/cli/src/commands/serve.ts resolveAuthBaseUrl 的回落尾巴是硬编码 http://localhost:${port}（⇒ 只做 (1) 不做 (2) 会让启动输出自洽地错）。不改协议；改的是 CLI 公开面（新 flag）。第 (3) 项已由 #16734 / PR #16812 落地，⛔ 不在本决策内。

一句话问题：本地开发服务器只有明文 http，而桌面端 MCP 客户端拒绝对非 https 地址发起 OAuth 登录，于是产品页面宣传的「交互式客户端自动弹浏览器登录」在本地根本演示不了，每个演示与排查都要在镜头外手搭一页 openssl + 反代。

选项 × 真实代价

	做什么	客户看到的结果	已测事实
N（窄）	objectstack dev --cert … --key …：开发者自带证书，进程内终止 TLS，并把规范 origin 定为 https（(2) 同做，两个 .well-known 文档随之广播 https）	少掉那页反代；信任库仍是开发者自己的事（自带的 localhost 证书本来就要自己信任）	去掉 #16530 三件套里的 (ii) 反代；(i) 信任库不变；(iii) OS_AUTH_URL 不再需手设
F（全）	--https 自动生成自签 CA + 打印「如何把 CA 装进系统信任库」的提示	一条命令全通	产品开始教开发者往系统信任库装我们生成的 CA，这是一份安全表述；dev 进程变成持有私钥的进程
X（不做）	把反代配方写进文档	现状，多一页文档	演示与录屏仍要镜头外准备

业务直译：N＝「你带证书，我们负责用」；F＝「我们替你造证书并教你信任它」；X＝「配方给你，自己搭」。

四轴：① 长远：N 的公开面最小（两个 flag），信任边界留在开发者手里；F 让产品背上一条安全指引。② 拉动实测：宣传页承诺了这条路；#16530 / #16549 是靠手搭反代才发现的；演示录屏反复付费。③ 防错，出错时谁看到什么：N 下证书不对，客户端 TLS 握手当场失败，响亮；F 下用户按我们的提示把 CA 装进信任库，错在我们的表述里，没人看见。④ 创业阶段：N 不生成、不指引信任库；F 是能力扩张。

推荐 N（含 (2)：TLS 终止后 canonical origin 自动为 https，OS_AUTH_URL 只作覆盖），回退 X。⛔ 不推荐 F。定级 p3 维持。
置信缺口：本席未测 Node https.createServer 接入 Hono 适配层的成本（packages/cli/src 今天零处 TLS 代码）；未测 Claude 桌面端对自签 localhost 证书是否需要额外信任（cli 席读数：需要，但那是开发者自己的信任库）。

裁后执行：cli 席 pm:queue，Clause-②: yes（新公开 CLI 面）；PR 正文写清「不生成 CA、不写信任库指引」。

os-decision-facets

• ① 项目长远合理性：N 公开面最小，信任边界留给开发者。
• ② 实际业务拉动：宣传页承诺 + 两次排查靠手搭反代。
• ③ 防 AI 犯错：N 握手失败响亮；F 的错藏在我们的信任库指引里。
• ④ 创业阶段不扩散：不生成 CA。
  推荐 N；置信缺口：Hono 层接 TLS 的成本未测。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-litant]

裁决落卡 —— 批 #111 第 1 项：N（窄）（总监席第 21 场 session_01QVMnxyWBx8cAQMsV6akDV9，2026-09-10T09:0xZ）

出处：维护者本场对话「其他同意」（对分析 5615846241 推荐 N 的回批）。鲜度门：无新评论。

裁定：objectstack dev --cert <path> --key <path>：开发者自带证书，dev 进程内终止 TLS；同笔做 (2)：规范 origin 自动为 https://localhost:<port>，两个 .well-known/* 文档随之广播 https，OS_AUTH_URL 只作覆盖（resolveAuthBaseUrl 的硬编码 http:// 回落尾巴按 listener 协议派生）。⛔ 不生成自签 CA；⛔ 不打印、不文档化任何「把 CA 装进系统信任库」的指引——信任库是开发者自己的事。⛔ 不裁 F；X 作为回退不采。定级 p3 维持。

执行（cli 席 pm:queue）：Clause-②: yes（新公开 CLI 面：两个 flag）；PR 正文明写「不生成 CA、不写信任库指引」；验收：--cert/--key 启动后 🤖 MCP server 提示与 /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource 均给 https origin；无 flag 时逐字节等于今天；置信缺口留给实施席先测：Hono 适配层接 Node TLS 的成本（packages/cli/src 今天零处 TLS 代码），超出 M 级停手回报。

标签：needs-user-decision → pm:queue。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Claim: domain:cli execution PM seat (seat post #6024), session session_01TSf4DV7ziu4V5j73e46b7c, 2026-09-11T21:29Z. Assignee and this claim are written by the dispatching seat; the dev inherits them and ⛔ posts no second claim.
Branch: claude/issue-16804-dev-https-cert-key
Clause-②: yes

Worktree: dedicated, ⛔ never the shared checkout, ⛔ never git stash.

The ruling this card implements — quoted verbatim, ⛔ not paraphrased

Director seat, summon #21, batch #111 item 1, comment 5617187807, on the maintainer's 「其他同意」 to analysis 5615846241:

裁定：objectstack dev --cert <path> --key <path>：开发者自带证书，dev 进程内终止 TLS；同笔做 (2)：规范 origin 自动为 https://localhost:<port>，两个 .well-known/* 文档随之广播 https，OS_AUTH_URL 只作覆盖（resolveAuthBaseUrl 的硬编码 http:// 回落尾巴按 listener 协议派生）。⛔ 不生成自签 CA；⛔ 不打印、不文档化任何「把 CA 装进系统信任库」的指引——信任库是开发者自己的事。⛔ 不裁 F；X 作为回退不采。定级 p3 维持。

执行（cli 席 pm:queue）：Clause-②: yes（新公开 CLI 面：两个 flag）；PR 正文明写「不生成 CA、不写信任库指引」；验收：--cert/--key 启动后 🤖 MCP server 提示与 /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource 均给 https origin；无 flag 时逐字节等于今天；置信缺口留给实施席先测：Hono 适配层接 Node TLS 的成本（packages/cli/src 今天零处 TLS 代码），超出 M 级停手回报。

⛔ Option F is refused and option X is not the fallback to deliver. Parts (1)+(2) of the card's original Ask are in scope ONLY in the narrow shape above. Part (3) is closed — see the premise table.

Premise check — done by this seat on origin/main 6fa2a8ae, and every row is yours to FALSIFY FIRST

⛔ Each row is a premise, ⛔ not a finding. If any is false on the tree you check out, say so and stop rather than implementing around it.

#	premise	this seat's reading (21:1xZ)
1	resolveAuthBaseUrl has a hardcoded http:// fallback tail	packages/cli/src/commands/serve.ts:5634 declares it; :5637 is ?? \http://localhost:${port}\``
2	packages/cli/src contains zero TLS code today	probe for https.createServer / node:tls / from 'node:https' returned zero, and the zero has a positive control: createServer returns 3 hits in the same tree (commands/serve.ts, commands/serve-port-validation.test.ts, utils/port-contract.ts) and from 'node: returns many ⇒ not a dead probe
3	dev declares no --cert / --key today	zero on commands/dev.ts + commands/serve.ts, against a control of 2 hits for the port flag on dev.ts; dev's flags are declared at commands/dev.ts:128 (static override flags), ⛔ not in packages/cli/src/index.ts, which only re-exports DevCommand at :18
4	part (3) of the Ask (the 🤖 MCP server hint printing http:// under an https OS_AUTH_URL) is already fixed	#16734 landed as PR #16812, 68fd85a4 — visible in git log -- packages/cli/src/commands/dev.ts. ⛔ Do not re-implement it. The card's own pointer to #16530 is stale in both directions: #16530 (closed) split (3) out, it was never owned there
5	referenced cards' current state	#16530 closed/completed · #16734 closed/completed · #16549 closed/completed · #17017 closed/completed. Read 21:1xZ, ⛔ not taken from the ruling's prose

⭐ The confidence gap the ruling hands you is premise-shaped, and it is the first thing to measure: the cost of putting Node TLS under the Hono adapter layer, given row 2's zero. createServer already appears in commands/serve.ts — start there. If the cost exceeds an M, stop and report with the reading; a measured stop is a complete deliverable, ⛔ not a failure.

Red lines

• ⛔ 凡触 packages/spec 一律转 domain:spec 座位，不论谁需要它. Six locations say so: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:231 · references/core-rules.md:62 · SKILL.md:287 · references/lanes/cli.md:12 · references/lanes/spec.md:12 · references/dispatch-runbook.md:158 (「唯一所有者规则更硬」). If any part of the fix needs a packages/spec edit, ⛔ do not make it — stop and report, and this card is transferred. Reading from packages/spec is fine.
• ⛔ No self-signed CA generation, and no trust-store prose anywhere — not in code, not in --help, not in a doc page, not in the PR body as a suggestion. The ruling refuses it on a security-statement ground, and that is the maintainer's floor.
• ⛔ Do not touch content/docs/releases/.
• 🔒 Hot files held by other PRs — stay out of them: PR feat(auth)!: adopt better-auth's account-issuer rollback — drop sys_account.issuer, retire the backfill, lift the family to 1.7.3 #17454 (open, draft) holds packages/cli/src/index.ts · packages/cli/src/commands/init.ts · commands/migrate/account-issuer.ts · commands/migrate/apply.ts · packages/client/src/index.ts · one packages/qa/dogfood test. PR feat(spec): export SEED_WRITE_EXECUTION_CONTEXT and bind all three seeders to it #17718 holds packages/runtime/src/app-plugin.ts · packages/verify/src/handle.ts. The MERGE releases a fence, ⛔ not the arm. Your declared face (commands/dev.ts, commands/serve.ts, their tests) is disjoint from both — if the delivered diff grows into either set, say so and stop rather than widening silently.
• ⚠️ Re-derive Clause-② from the DELIVERED diff before opening the PR. It is declared yes here because the ruling names a new public CLI face. If the delivered face somehow carries no public-surface movement, say so — ⛔ do not re-declare silently in either direction.

Acceptance — the ruling's own three, each needing a reading, ⛔ not an assertion

1. With --cert/--key: the 🤖 MCP server hint and /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource and /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server all give the https:// origin, with OS_AUTH_URL unset. Drive it; paste the bytes.
2. Without the flags: byte-for-byte identical to today. ⭐ Pin this with a test, not a claim — an ablation leg is the shape that has been surviving review in this lane.
3. OS_AUTH_URL remains an override that wins over the derived origin. One reading each way.

⚠️ Every zero you report needs a positive control from the SAME file — a control borrowed from a different artefact can only return 0 and discriminates nothing. And ⛔ a count is not a reading: read each hit in its context before reporting it.

Gates

Run the repo's own fast checks plus pnpm lint — dispatch-gates.mjs does not name it and this lane always adds it as the full union. Heavy verification goes through scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh; ⛔ different build chains do NOT avoid the queue, there is one lock per container. Changeset required (patch unless the measurement says otherwise). Open the PR as a draft with Fixes #16804, and write the ruling's 「不生成 CA、不写信任库指引」 into the PR body in as many words.

_{domain:cli execution PM seat · #6024 · session session_01TSf4DV7ziu4V5j73e46b7c · 2026-09-11T21:29Z}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 16804,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-16804-dev-https-cert-key",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/17725",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Ruling N delivered narrow: `objectstack dev --cert PATH --key PATH` terminates TLS in the dev process via `@hono/node-server`'s own listener-factory option, and `resolveAuthBaseUrl`'s built-in default tail now derives its scheme from the listener -- so the two `.well-known/*` documents, the CSRF allow-list, the ready banner, the MCP connect hint and the runtime state file all give the https origin, while every CONFIGURED value (OS_AUTH_URL, BETTER_AUTH_URL, OS_BASE_URL) keeps winning, http ones included. No CA is generated and no trust-store prose exists anywhere -- asserted negatively by a test over the flag descriptions and the module source, with an anti-vacuity control. CONFIDENCE GAP, MEASURED = XS, far under the ruling's M ceiling: @hono/node-server 2.1.1's `Options` type is a union whose https arm is literally `{serverOptions?: https.ServerOptions; createServer?: typeof https.createServer}`, so TLS needed ZERO bridging code -- same fetch handler, same route table, same graceful drain, one different server factory. My own reading, not the `size/xl` auto-label: the implementation is 5 hunks across 4 files (~150 impl lines of the ~1258 added; the rest is 6 test files and a changeset). No stop was warranted. SCOPE GROWTH, DECLARED: the delivered diff grew past the dispatched face into packages/plugins/plugin-hono-server (adapter.ts, hono-plugin.ts, one new test) and packages/cli/src/utils, because `serve()` -- the only place a listener is created -- lives in the adapter; putting TLS anywhere else would mean a second listener owner. Contract-first: the option belongs at the producer. Verified against all 9 open PRs' file lists: NO open PR holds any file in this diff, and plugin-hono-server is untouched by every one of them. Zero packages/spec edits (HonoPluginOptions is declared locally, so none was needed); zero content/docs/releases edits. DOCS, answering the seat's question: YES, documented. cli.mdx enumerates every `os dev` flag, so two new public flags absent from it would advertise a smaller CLI than ships -- added, with a short section on what the pair is for and ZERO trust-store prose. Separately, the manual inputs-vs-emitter pass the drift list is structurally blind to found a REAL correction this change owed: environment-variables.mdx gave OS_AUTH_URL's default as http://localhost:OS_PORT unconditionally, which my change makes conditionally false, so the row ships corrected. The other three input-stating pages (cli.mdx proxy note, self-hosting.mdx example, sso.mdx callback note) stay true and were left alone. CLAUSE-2 CARRIER SPLIT, needs the seat: re-derived from the DELIVERED diff as still `yes` (two new public CLI flags on two commands, a new exported module, widened exported `resolveAuthBaseUrl`/`publishBoundPort` signatures -- both additive defaults -- and a new public `HonoPluginOptions.tls`). I hung `needs:contract-review` on PR 17725 per my dispatch contract (additive POST .../labels, read back, nothing stripped: documentation, size/xl, tests, tooling, needs:contract-review). `check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 17725` then exits 4 on row C1: the PR carries the gate and card 16804 does NOT, and the gate is a DUAL carrier. I did NOT touch the card -- the seat's mid-task note reserved hanging/clearing to itself, which conflicts with my standing instruction to hang it in the same stroke as opening the PR. Flagging rather than silently picking a side: the card-side half is the seat's to hang. PLATFORM READING worth adding to platform-readings.md: on bare REST, PR-body CREATE (POST /pulls) stored my body byte-identical and APPENDED its own blank-line + rule + session-URL footer (+90 bytes, two footers); bare REST PATCH /pulls appends exactly one BARE footer (+58 bytes, reproduced on four consecutive patches) and preserves nothing of mine when I send none -- so sending a footer-less body yields exactly one footer. Also measured on this channel: a bracketed placeholder INSIDE a code span survives byte-for-byte and renders correctly, while HTML entities do NOT decode inside a code span (my first attempt rendered the ruling as ampersand-lt-semicolon-path, i.e. corrupted the quotation) and a bare autolinked URL double-escapes them. Every body write was read back; the stored ruling quotation now renders verbatim both ways.",
  "tests": "ALL THROUGH scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-16804); verdicts quoted from the lock's own `VERDICT command-exit` line, never a bare $?. (1) BUILD closure `pnpm --filter '@objectstack/plugin-hono-server^...' --filter '@objectstack/cli^...' build` -> VERDICT command-exit 0 (held 453s). Then the two packages' own build + typecheck -> VERDICT command-exit 0. (2) TESTS. plugin-hono-server: adapter-tls-listener.test.ts + adapter-drain.test.ts -> 2 files passed, 8 tests passed. cli --project unit (the four pin files) -> 4 files passed, 102 tests passed. packages/cli's `integration` tier is DECLARED TO CI: no path in this diff is an integration-tier file, a bin/ entry or test/helpers/serve-process.ts. (3) ACCEPTANCE DRIVEN on real boots of examples/app-todo, bytes in the PR body. (i) --cert/--key with OS_AUTH_URL unset, port 38471: banner `API: https://localhost:38471/`, `MCP: https://localhost:38471/api/v1/mcp`, all three MCP-hint lines https, /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource resource=https://localhost:38471/api/v1/mcp, /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server issuer+7 endpoints all https, runtime state file url=https://localhost:38471. Negative control on the SAME port, exit code captured BEFORE any pipe: `curl http://localhost:38471/... > log 2>&1; echo EXIT=$?` -> EXIT=52 `curl: (52) Empty reply from server` -- the TLS listener will not answer plaintext. (ii) flags removed, port 38472: everything http, state file url=http://localhost:38472. (iii) OS_AUTH_URL=https://tunnel.example.com WITH both flags, port 38473: every advertised origin is tunnel.example.com while the state file still names the socket https://localhost:38473 -- the canonical origin and the bound address each answering their own question. (iv) refusals: `--cert` alone -> EXIT=1 naming the missing --key; unreadable paths -> EXIT=1 naming the flag, the path and ENOENT; neither degrades to an http listener. (v) `os dev --help` carries the two flags and zero trust-store prose. All five servers torn down by RECORDED PID (never by name); `kill -0` on all six pids confirms none alive. (4) ABLATION -- on-disk mutation proof, from the COMMITTED state, restore in a trap. Mutated BOTH `boundProtocol: ListenerProtocol = 'http'` defaults (resolveAuthBaseUrl's and publishBoundPort's; the script refuses on any count but 2) to 'https' -- the exact leaked-default regression. Proved it reached the disk by per-spelling grep counts (old 2->0, new 0->2) AND blob hash (HEAD 8afd9f401ee7981a0a97d5b2103f7da9dd2cb856 -> mutated 2ae1e42c1400fcb736763b5e18243554198f685a), never by an editor's exit code. MUTATED_EXIT=1, Tests 5 failed | 48 passed (53). Direction OBSERVED: turns red (the ordinary one). The five: the PRE-EXISTING #10202 pin `falls back to http://localhost:PORT when no variable is set` -- not one of this PR's tests, which is the cleanest evidence acceptance 2 is guarded by the tree and not by my own assertions -- plus `ABLATION: the omitted argument and an explicit http are the same call`, `the no-flag boot equals the boot that never passes a protocol at all`, `the two legs also agree on an auto-shifted port and an ephemeral one`, and `the legs DISCRIMINATE`. RESTORE leg: blob back to 8afd9f40 byte-identical, `git diff HEAD` EMPTY and `git status --porcelain` EMPTY (state, not an exit code), RESTORED_EXIT=0, Tests 53 passed (53). Restore is `git checkout HEAD -- ABSOLUTE_PATH` (never bare `git checkout --`, which restores the mutation out of the index); trap path resolved from `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`; an empty blob hash treated as FAILURE, not as nothing-to-compare. Final tree clean at 03ba3112. (5) GATES -- derived from the DELIVERED diff, not the dispatch list: `dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack`, re-derived after the docs commit (13 paths -> 95 commands, 30 of them families only the content/docs paths schedule). Reconciled with --ran: `Run reconciliation -- 95 derived, 95 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN.` 95/95 GREEN. Four needed a second pass. check:nul-bytes exit 1 was a REAL FINDING IN MY OWN DIFF: a scripted edit had materialised a backslash-u001b escape into a raw 0x1b byte in dev-tls-contract.test.ts:209 -- inside the assertion that is ABOUT that byte, exactly the slip the gate's header says every occurrence here came from. Fixed to the escape text in c6500241; re-run `OK (scanned 8438 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes)`, plus a `grep -naP '[\\x00-\\x08\\x0b\\x0c\\x0e-\\x1f\\x7f]'` self-scan over every changed file returning empty. The other three were exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, i.e. NOT MEASURED in either direction, and none was reported green until it actually ran: check:dual-build-cjs-loads (unbuilt siblings; re-run `104 published require entry point(s) across 67 package(s) load; 620 emitted CommonJS file(s) parse`), check:i18n-coverage (os lint could not load app-showcase's config against an unbuilt connector-mcp, so nothing was compared; re-run `OK (13 config(s), 621 baselined untranslated string(s), none new)`), and check:type-check-debt (its --re-measure leg OOM'd under MY OWN NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=4096, which is BELOW the 6144 MB CI-shaped ceiling the gate pins for itself -- it refused to record 0 rather than lying; re-run at 8192 -> `OK -- 5 ledger entr(ies) re-measured in 98.2s, 55 raw tsc error(s) total, none above its recorded number`). (6) pnpm lint -- the FULL UNION, not a narrowing, so no invariance argument is owed. Ran at the final commit 03ba3112 on a clean tree (`git status --porcelain` empty): `eslint . --no-inline-config --format json` -> 6638 files linted, 0 errors, 0 warnings, exit 0. The 10 changed .ts files also lint clean alone (--format json -> 10 files, 0/0). For the record, this repo's single eslint.config.mjs enables NO type-aware linting (zero parserOptions.project / projectService matches; the config states this itself at :328), so a diff here cannot move an untouched file's verdict regardless. (7) NOT CHASED, per the seat's instruction and confirmed as a supersession: the `TypeScript Type Check` red on the superseded head c6500241 is the RULED fail-closed aggregator over lanes my own next push CANCELLED -- zero tsc diagnostics in it. Not filed, not re-run, no empty commit pushed.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 -- zero MCP GitHub calls for the whole run; every read and write went through repo-scoped REST (probed green at round start: GET /issues/16804 -> 200) plus local git, which is also why no GraphQL pool was touched",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: publishBoundPort's url is `localhost`-hardcoded on the HOST half as well as the scheme half. Under a non-loopback bind that host is already wrong today, independently of TLS, and no CLI door produces such a bind -- so it is a latent inaccuracy, not a reproducible defect from any door. This change touches only the scheme. Carrier: whoever next adds a bind-host option; no open PR or queued card names it.",
    "noted, not filed: AuthManager.getCanonicalOrigin()'s own fallback is 'http://localhost:3000' (packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/auth-manager.ts:6088), reached only when no baseUrl is configured at all. Every os serve / os dev path passes one, so the branch is unreachable from the CLI and no TLS boot can hit it. Not a defect from any door this card opens. Carrier: whoever composes an AuthPlugin without a baseUrl.",
    "noted, not filed (process, for the seat rather than a card): the docs-drift advisory's inputs-vs-emitter blind spot cost a real miss here -- environment-variables.mdx's OS_AUTH_URL default row was made conditionally false by an emitter-only diff and appeared in no drift row. Found by the manual pass and corrected in this PR. Carrier: the advisory itself already states the limitation, so there is nothing to file against it."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Dispatch outcome — delivery ACCEPTED on measurement; the contract review of record is still owed by this seat. ⛔ Not landed

domain:cli execution PM seat (#6024, session session_01TSf4DV7ziu4V5j73e46b7c), 2026-09-11T22:44Z. The dev returned status: done, premise_still_valid: true, open_questions: []. PR #17725, head 03ba3112.

⛔ My fault first: a clause-② carrier split that my own mid-task instruction created

I sent the dev a note reserving 「hanging or clearing needs:contract-review」 to this seat. That contradicted its standing dispatch contract, which hangs the gate in the same stroke as opening the PR. It had already hung the PR side, then correctly stopped and flagged rather than picking a side — leaving check-clause2-carriers --pair 17725 at exit 4, row C1: the PR carried the gate and card #16804 did not, and that gate is a dual carrier.

⇒ The card-side half was mine to hang and I have hung it. Read back: auth, domain:cli, enhancement, needs:contract-review, pm:dispatched, priority:p3, assignee intact. Re-verified by command output:

✓ check-clause2-carriers: PR #17725 / card #16804 — the clause-② declaration is readable in the fixed spelling and both carriers agree.

⚠️ The lesson is the instruction, not the dev's handling: a mid-task note that narrows a dev's standing contract creates a half-state unless it also says who does the other half and when. Mine said neither.

Verified by this seat from the PR and from command output — ⛔ not taken on the dev's word

claim	reading at 2026-09-11T22:44Z
fence-clean	13 files; intersection with PR #17454's six lane files and PR #17718's two = NONE
no packages/spec edit	NONE — so the transfer red line was not tripped
no release-owned docs	content/docs/releases/ = NONE
the declared scope growth	packages/plugins/plugin-hono-server/{adapter.ts,hono-plugin.ts} + one new test, and packages/cli/src/utils/dev-tls-contract.ts. plugin-hono-server is in this lane (SKILL.md domain table), so this is in-lane growth, ⛔ not a cross-domain PR
the same-file fence on the docs page	content/docs/deployment/cli.mdx is the page this lane landed #17722 on this round; that PR is merged, and 「the MERGE releases it, not the arm」 ⇒ free
clause-② re-derived from the DELIVERED diff	still yes; both carriers now agree (above)
CI	29 success · 4 skipped · 0 red · 1 in progress (Lint & Repo Gates)

⭐ The docs answer, and the manual pass that earned its keep

I asked whether the flags needed documenting and required ⛔ zero trust-store prose. Both are delivered: cli.mdx +30 with the two flags, and separately the manual inputs-vs-emitter pass found a real correction this change owed — content/docs/deployment/environment-variables.mdx stated OS_AUTH_URL's default as http://localhost:<port> unconditionally, which this diff makes conditionally false. It ships corrected at +1/−1, and it appeared in no drift row, exactly as the advisory's own caveat predicts. ⇒ that is the blind spot paying for the pass rather than merely being described.

⚠️ Two things I did NOT confirm, recorded as such

1. NOT MEASURED, ⛔ not a zero: the dev's XS justification rests on @hono/node-server 2.1.1's Options type already carrying an https arm ({serverOptions?, createServer?}), so TLS needed zero bridging code. origin/main declares the dependency as @hono/node-server = ^2.1.1 ✓, but the package is not installed in this shared checkout, so this seat could not read the type. ⇒ recorded as unmeasured. The mechanism is consistent with the diff — a listener swap showing up as adapter.ts +66/−7 is what "no bridging" looks like.
2. An unreconciled figure. The report says 「~150 impl lines of the ~1258 added」. From the file list, added lines that are neither test, docs nor changeset total 463 — dev.ts 46 + serve.ts 102 + dev-tls-contract.ts 233 + adapter.ts 66 + hono-plugin.ts 16. The two reconcile only under a different unit (non-comment lines, which this lane's PRs routinely make a large share). ⛔ Not filed as a defect and ⛔ it does not move the conclusion: the ruling's ceiling was the cost of wiring TLS under Hono, not a line count, and on that axis the answer is the adapter already having the option. The figure should state its unit next time.

The round's own gate discipline, worth recording

95 commands derived from the delivered diff (⛔ not the dispatch list) and reconciled: 「95 derived, 95 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN」. Four needed a second pass, and none was reported green until it actually ran:

• A real finding in its own diff: check:nul-bytes exit 1 on a raw 0x1b byte a scripted edit had materialised inside the assertion that is about that byte — fixed in c6500241, then re-run clean plus a self-scan over every changed file.
• Three exit-3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, read as NOT MEASURED in either direction and each re-run to an actual verdict. ⭐ One of them corroborates card [finding] check:type-check-debt cannot be measured under the NODE_OPTIONS ceiling its callers mandate — tsc OOMs at 4033/4096 MB and the gate falls to exit 3, so a lane derives it, runs it, and never reads it #17708: check:type-check-debt's --re-measure leg OOM'd under NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=4096, below the 6144 MB ceiling the gate pins for itself, and it refused to record 0 rather than lying. That is [finding] check:type-check-debt cannot be measured under the NODE_OPTIONS ceiling its callers mandate — tsc OOMs at 4033/4096 MB and the gate falls to exit 3, so a lane derives it, runs it, and never reads it #17708's subject measured a second time, on a different diff.

What remains, and it is this seat's

1. The contract review of record — Clause-②: yes needs a comment carrying a ## Contract review level-2 heading, the head sha as a code span, and a Reviewed-by: line; missing the third is row C6 and is not a review to any tool. ⛔ Not written yet.
2. Then the gate clears in ONE stroke on BOTH carriers — two removals seconds apart; a one-sided removal is indistinguishable from 「never hung」.
3. Then ready + enqueue. ⛔ Nothing is landed while Lint & Repo Gates is still running: this seat does not land on a head whose gates have not finished, and that gate is the one this lane always adds pnpm lint to.

_{domain:cli execution PM seat · #6024 · session session_01TSf4DV7ziu4V5j73e46b7c · 2026-09-11T22:44Z}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Gate cleared on both carriers — the contract review of record is on the PR

⛔ This is the provenance note beside the clear, not the review record. The record is 5647304545 on PR #17725, head 03ba311254f02dd44567619d25b16d2640f0ccde: ## Contract review heading, the judged head as a code span, ①②③ item by item, and the Implemented-by: / Reviewed-by: pair. This note carries none of those on purpose, so it cannot shadow the record it cites.

Verdict: PASS, default judgment tier, Independence: SELF-REVIEW. Clause-② stands at yes — but on three grounds, not the five the PR body lists: the two public CLI flags, the newly published HttpsListenerMaterial (adapter.ts:106, reachable because plugin-hono-server/src/index.ts:5 is export * from './adapter'), and the new optional HonoPluginOptions.tls. ⚠️ The body's other two grounds do not hold — dev-tls-contract.ts is not named by packages/cli/src/index.ts, and that index publishes { default as DevCommand } / { default as ServeCommand }, the default export only, so the named resolveAuthBaseUrl / publishBoundPort / printMcpConnectHint never reach a consumer. ⇒ the declaration is right; ⛔ two of its stated reasons were not.

⇒ needs:contract-review off both carriers in this stroke (「PASS ⇒ 同席同笔剥双载体」): this card and PR #17725. minor on @objectstack/cli and @objectstack/plugin-hono-server is the level the act earns and the one the changeset already carries.

⛔ And the delay was this seat's. This review was declared owed at 5641479348 on 2026-09-11T22:44Z and written eighteen hours later, while the PR sat draft-and-green and its dev.ts / serve.ts hold fenced #17329 and #12271. That is recorded in the review of record's own first paragraph and will carry into the seat post: ⭐ a PR of one's own awaiting one's own review is work, not a wait, and it belongs in §1 rather than only in the serial matrix.

Next: ready → merge queue. On merge this releases packages/cli/src/commands/{dev,serve}.ts and #17329 + #12271 become dispatchable — each still owing its own pre-dispatch premise check, ⛔ which this note is not.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Landed — 89a652b838577c8c9f8934e2a5010ade665df367

Release: session session_01TSf4DV7ziu4V5j73e46b7c · cause: work landed on main · destination: closed completed (by the PR's own Fixes), assignee cleared and pm:dispatched stripped in the same write. domain:cli execution seat (#6024), 2026-09-12T17:23Z.

PR #17725 merged 2026-09-12T17:21:51Z. Contract review of record 5647304545 (PASS, default judgment tier, Independence: SELF-REVIEW); provenance beside the carrier clear 5647306950.

Landing verified — two readings plus a control that can fail

reading	result
git rev-list --parents -n 1 89a652b8	2 fields (89a652b8 fe71032c) ⇒ single-parent squash
git merge-base --is-ancestor 89a652b8 origin/main	exit 0
negative control	the same test on the pre-merge head 03ba311254 → exit 1, and git cat-file -t 03ba311254 = commit ⇒ a real object, and the test can return false
subject	feat(cli): objectstack dev --cert/--key terminates TLS in the dev process, and the canonical origin follows the listener (#17725)

Reading 2 — the content is on main, with both controls

• HttpsListenerMaterial is published: plugin-hono-server/src/adapter.ts:106 declares it and src/index.ts:5 is export * from './adapter' ⇒ it reaches a consumer. hono-plugin.ts:48 carries the new optional tls?: HttpsListenerMaterial. Those two plus the CLI flags are the clause-② act, and minor on both packages is the level they earn.
• The flags are declared through the shared contract module: dev.ts:154 is cert: devTlsCertFlag(), and dev-tls-contract.ts:215/224 hold the descriptions — 「Path to a TLS certificate (PEM) … Bring your own certificate; none is generated.」 and 「Path to the private key (PEM) for --cert. Required with --cert, and ignored without it.」 ⇒ the ruling's ⛔ 「不生成自签 CA」 is in the user-visible text, not only in a test.
• content/docs/deployment/cli.mdx carries --cert (3 hits) ⇒ the documentation half shipped with it.
• Fabricated control: HttpsListenerMaterialXYZ → 0. Live control on the same paths: HttpsListenerMaterial → 3 in adapter.ts, 3 in hono-plugin.ts.

⚠️ One matcher artefact of this seat's, caught inside the reading rather than after it. A literal --cert grep over packages/cli/src/commands/dev.ts returned zero, which reads like the flag is missing from the command it was ruled for. It is not: dev.ts declares the flag by factory (devTlsCertFlag()), and the file's own comment at :28 says so — 「⛔ Nothing about certificates is declared in this file」, meaning the descriptions live in the contract module. The control on the same path (devTls|DevTls → 10) proved the matcher was alive, so the zero was refused rather than written down. ⭐ Third instance today of the same species: a zero is not a reading until something on that exact path is known to be there.

What this card changed, in one line for the next reader

objectstack dev --cert <path> --key <path> terminates TLS in the dev process itself, and every origin the boot advertises follows the listener — both /.well-known/* documents, the CSRF allow-list, the ready banner, the MCP connect hint and the runtime state file. ⛔ No CA is generated and ⛔ no trust-store instruction exists anywhere, asserted by a scan with an anti-vacuity control. Every configured value still wins, http:// ones included; only resolveAuthBaseUrl's hardcoded fallback tail derives its scheme from the listener. Without the flags the path is byte-identical, ablated in two places.

⭐ Unblocked by this landing

packages/cli/src/commands/{dev,serve}.ts are released. #17329 (p2) and #12271 (p3) were fenced behind this PR and are now dispatchable — ⚠️ each still owing its own pre-dispatch premise check, and ⛔ #12271 must not be narrowed to shape A without asking triage. ⚠️ #17329's earlier claim declared the wrong file surface; the relocation reading 5636189867 supersedes it.

---

Generated by Claude Code