You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2020. It is now read-only.
Currently storing-expansive data such as base64-encoded image and tables' data is stored directly in their related objects (e.g. story metadata for covers, resources for table data, resources or contextualizers for base64-encoded images).
This initial choice is relevant when goal number 1 is sustainability and robustness of peritext stories files for use cases such as articles or students work. This is less realistic for handling data-intensive or image-intensive book-length stories.
It should be possible to handle data differently. Ideas :
storing these expansive fields values as refs resolved else where (an assets field at story's level ?) so that the question of their retrieval is separated from the story contents themselves (and can be loaded without them for instance)
store a url instead of direct data (or - more advanced - store some http query params to access an api and retrieve the data)
store a reference to a local file being stored elsewhere
Currently storing-expansive data such as base64-encoded image and tables' data is stored directly in their related objects (e.g. story metadata for covers, resources for table data, resources or contextualizers for base64-encoded images).
This initial choice is relevant when goal number 1 is sustainability and robustness of peritext stories files for use cases such as articles or students work. This is less realistic for handling data-intensive or image-intensive book-length stories.
It should be possible to handle data differently. Ideas :
assetsfield at story's level ?) so that the question of their retrieval is separated from the story contents themselves (and can be loaded without them for instance)