-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathGPU.html
More file actions
415 lines (304 loc) · 25.4 KB
/
Copy pathGPU.html
File metadata and controls
415 lines (304 loc) · 25.4 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>NewsFlash | Post</title>
<!-- Favicon -->
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="32x32" href="./assets/images/favicon.png">
<!-- Remix icons -->
<link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/remixicon@2.5.0/fonts/remixicon.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- Swiper.js styles -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="./assets/css/swiper-bundle.min.css"/>
<!-- Custom styles -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="./assets/css/main.css">
</head>
<body>
<!-- Header -->
<header class="header" id="header">
<nav class="navbar container">
<a href="./index.html">
<h2 class="logo">TechFlash</h2>
</a>
<div class="menu" id="menu">
<ul class="list">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link current">Home</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Categories</a>
<ul class="Categories">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">AI</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">IOT</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">E-sports</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Software</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Blockchain</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">How-to-do</a>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Reviews</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">News</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Contact</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item screen-lg-hidden">
<a href="./sign-in.html" class="list-link">Sign in</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item screen-lg-hidden">
<a href="./sign-up.html" class="list-link">Sign up</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="list list-right">
<button class="btn place-items-center" id="theme-toggle-btn">
<i class="ri-sun-line sun-icon"></i>
<i class="ri-moon-line moon-icon"></i>
</button>
<button class="btn place-items-center" id="search-icon">
<i class="ri-search-line"></i>
</button>
<button class="btn place-items-center screen-lg-hidden menu-toggle-icon" id="menu-toggle-icon">
<i class="ri-menu-3-line open-menu-icon"></i>
<i class="ri-close-line close-menu-icon"></i>
</button>
<a href="sign-in.html" class="list-link screen-sm-hidden">Sign in</a>
<a href="sign-up.html" class="btn sign-up-btn fancy-border screen-sm-hidden">
<span>Sign up</span>
</a>
</div>
</nav>
</header>
<!-- Search -->
<div class="search-form-container container" id="search-form-container">
<div class="form-container-inner">
<form action="" class="form">
<input class="form-input" type="text" placeholder="What are you looking for?">
<button class="btn form-btn" type="submit">
<i class="ri-search-line"></i>
</button>
</form>
<span class="form-note">Or press ESC to close.</span>
</div>
<button class="btn form-close-btn place-items-center" id="form-close-btn">
<i class="ri-close-line"></i>
</button>
</div>
<!-- blog post -->
<section class="blog-post section-header-offset">
<div class="blog-post-container container">
<div class="blog-post-data">
<h3 class="title blog-post-title">GeForce RTX 4060 vs. Radeon RX 7600: $300 GPU Upgrade</h3>
<div class="article-data">
<span>Aug 13th 2023</span>
<span class="article-data-spacer"></span>
<span>10 Min read</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/1.jpg" alt="">
<h4>Today, we've got an in-depth comparison between the Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce RTX 4060. After reviewing the RTX 4060 for the first time a few weeks ago, we came away quite disappointed, concluding that neither the RTX 4060 nor the competing Radeon 7600 were worth buying in the current market – not as long as the previous-gen Radeon 6700 XT could be had for $330, offering more performance and a bigger VRAM buffer.</h4>
<p>As of writing, the Radeon 6700 XT can still be purchased new from retailers for $330, with open-box stock selling for as low as $300. So our recommendation remains to buy the 6700 XT over either of the newer releases. But what if you don't have affordable 6700 XT's in your region, or you're reading this months later when either all Radeon 6700 XT stock has dried up or the 7600 and/or 4060 have dropped in price? Which one should you buy?</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/2.jpg" alt="">
<p>Right now, the Radeon RX 7600 is typically selling at the $270 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 is also typically selling at its $300 MSRP. This makes the Radeon GPU 10% cheaper, which is a nice discount, but is it worth it?</p>
<p>Does a $30 saving justify losing out on DLSS support, more mature ray tracing support, and improved power efficiency? Well, let's find out.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/3.jpg" alt="">
<p>For testing, the CPU used is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which has been paired with the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master, using 32GB of DDR5-6000 CL30 memory. As usual, we'll go over the data for around a dozen titles before jumping into the detailed breakdown graphs. The resolutions of interest here are 1080p and 1440p, so let's get into it.</p>
<h3>Benchmarks</h3>
<p>First up, we have Cyberpunk 2077 using the high-quality preset, and under these conditions, we found the 7600 to be 5% faster at 1080p and 13% faster at 1440p. So, a clear win here for the Radeon GPU, especially at 1440p where the margin starts to become significant.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/4.jpg" alt="">
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/5.jpg" alt="">
<p>However, if you want to enable ray tracing, the RX 7600 might not be the best choice; in fact, it isn't, with the RTX 4060 delivering more than twice as much performance at both resolutions. That said, it's debatable as to how useful the RTX 4060 is here. With DLSS enabled, it's playable at 1080p, but upscaling looks pretty bad, and while frame generation goes that extra mile in smoothing things out, we'd rather just play using the high preset and forget about ray tracing entirely at this performance tier. But if you disagree, then we strongly recommend buying the RTX 4060 for ray tracing.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/6.jpg" alt="">
<p>Next up, we have Call of Duty Modern Warfare II, and this is a very favorable title for AMD that sees the 7600 win by a 39% margin at 1080p, though that margin is heavily reduced at 1440p to 17%, which admittedly is still a very large margin and a clear win for AMD.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/7.jpg" alt="">
<p>Moving on, we see that performance in A Plague Tale: Requiem is pretty well neck and neck at both tested resolutions, with no more than a 5% margin in it, so it's pretty safe to call this one a tie. Performance using the ultra-quality preset isn't amazing for $300-ish current-gen GPUs, but at least we're getting over 60 fps at 1080p, so we guess there is that.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/8.jpg" alt="">
<p>The Callisto Protocol also provides neck-and-neck results when using the ultra-quality preset; the 7600 was just a few frames faster at 1080p, while the 4060 just nudged ahead at 1440p, so overall a tie here.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/9.jpg" alt="">
<p>However, if we enable ray tracing, the RTX 4060 enjoys an easy win, though these results are somewhat invalid given both GPUs will run out of VRAM after a few minutes of gameplay, but this is how frame rates look before the memory buffer fills up. Scaling will also be much the same with the high-quality preset with ray tracing enabled, so the margins are valid in that sense.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/10.jpg" alt="">
<p>Next up, we have Fortnite using the DirectX 11 mode with the epic quality preset. This configuration hands the RTX 4060 an easy win, delivering 22% more performance at 1080p and 16% more at 1440p. Typically speaking, if you play a lot of Fortnite, you are best served with a GeForce GPU.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/11.jpg" alt="">
<p>Then with ray tracing enabled, we've switched to DX12, and now the RTX 4060 is seen to be 43% faster at 1080p and 37% faster at 1440p. Again, performance with ray tracing isn't very impressive with just 40 fps at 1080p, and while DLSS will help to boost frame rates towards 60 fps, image quality will take a hit.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/12.jpg" alt="">
<p>Benchmarking Resident Evil 4 using the second highest quality preset, we find that the RTX 4060 is 14% faster at 1080p, so a good performance advantage there. But when increasing the resolution to 1440p, that margin evaporates, and now the 7600 and 4060 are once again delivering comparable performance.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/13.jpg" alt="">
<p>Now when using the ray tracing preset, so the max quality preset, the RTX 4060 jumps ahead by a 28% margin at 1080p. So an easy win here for the GeForce GPU, though again we're looking at just 37 fps on average, which isn't really playable in our opinion, so some heavy tweaking to the quality settings will be required.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/14.jpg" alt="">
<p>Next, we have Spider-Man Remastered, and here the GeForce GPU provided the best results at both tested resolutions, delivering 13% more frames at 1080p and 11% more at 1440p. So a clear win here for Nvidia, though it's worth noting that both GPUs delivered exceptionally good performance in this title using the very high-quality preset.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/15.jpg" alt="">
<p>Now, dropping the quality preset to high but enabling high-quality ray tracing, we find a game where you can enable RT effects with a high level of visual detail. Interestingly, this is also a game that doesn't destroy the RX 7600 with RT enabled, allowing for highly playable performance even at 1440p, which is quite incredible. Still, the 4060 was 14% faster at 1080p and 16% faster at 1440p.</p>
<h3>Performance Summary</h3>
<p>We've just examined almost a dozen of the 40 games tested, some with and without RT (ray tracing) enabled. Now it's time to see how these two GPUs, the RX 7600 and RTX 4060, compare across all the games tested. Let's start with the 1080p data.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/16.jpg" alt="">
<p>Here, we see that on average the Radeon RX 7600 was 7% slower than the 4060 at 1080p, a result based on all 40 games tested along with various different configurations. The only big win for the Radeon GPU was seen in Call of Duty, while all significant losses were observed with ray tracing enabled. For those uninterested in that data, we can examine the results without RT.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/17.jpg" alt="">
<p>If we remove all the RT results, we find that on average the RX 7600 is just 2% slower than the 4060, meaning the performance overall is nearly identical. The only outlier here is Call of Duty, but even if we remove that result, the overall figure changes by only a percent, making the 7600 3% slower. It's fair to say, then, that for rasterization performance the 7600 and 4060 are typically quite comparable.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/18.jpg" alt="">
<p>The big problem for AMD continues to be ray tracing performance. If you care at all about RT performance, we've been recommending a GeForce GPU for years. Of course, there are caveats that come with that recommendation for a lower-end product like the RTX 4060, as it typically lacks the required processing power to use ray tracing meaningfully, and the upscaling quality is less than optimal at 1080p.</p>
<p>However, the RX 7600 was 20% slower on average with ray tracing enabled, highlighting just how much of an advantage Nvidia still has in this area.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/19.jpg" alt="">
<p>Moving to the higher 1440p resolution, we see that the RX 7600 was 9% slower on average. The Radeon GPU actually fared a bit worse at this higher resolution, though the margins are largely similar. It also costs 10% less, so this result is hardly a massive blow for the 7600.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/20.jpg" alt="">
<p>But if we remove the ray tracing data again, we find that overall performance is much the same at 1440p, and there aren't any major outliers. Thus, for rasterization performance at this resolution, the 7600 and 4060 are roughly equal.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/21.jpg" alt="">
<p>When it comes to ray tracing-only data, the RTX 4060 was, in our opinion, completely useless at this resolution with RT effects enabled. It will likely require heavy upscaling and frame generation to be usable. So, although the 7600 was 28% slower here, a substantial margin, we're not sure it has much practical significance for the average gamer.</p>
<h3>No Discount, No Winners</h3>
<p>So there you have it. As we found in our day-one review, the GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 7600 are very evenly matched, and this is particularly true for rasterization performance. The question now is, is the RTX 4060 worth the extra $30, an 11% premium? Even at this price point, $30 isn't a huge amount of money, but it's also not nothing.</p>
<p>The problem for AMD in this matchup is that the RX 7600 doesn't outperform the RTX 4060, except in a select few games where it's faster. There's no extra VRAM on offer here, no additional features, nothing that you don't get with the GeForce GPU. The RTX 4060, on the other hand, offers superior ray tracing performance. While we personally place almost no value on that, it's still a factor, and how much you weigh it will depend on your own personal preferences.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/22.jpg" alt="">
<p>The same applies to DLSS or more specifically the Frame Generation feature. This one is completely useless for us as we mostly play competitive multiplayer titles, and DLSS 3 is detrimental here, hurting latency for no real benefit, so you simply wouldn't use it.</p>
<p>Also, how useless Frame Generation is for single-player gamers will depend on the gamer. Many of you have told us you don't like it, while many others have said you love it. Our feedback so far is that it's only useful under specific conditions in certain single-player games, so opinions will vary on that one.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/23.jpg" alt="">
<p>The key advantages of the RTX 4060 include ray tracing support, frame generation, and superior power efficiency, none of which will be useful for everyone. However, better power efficiency is something everyone can benefit from, but it's hard to say how many gamers care about shaving 40 watts off their total system usage.</p>
<p>Based on the testing we've done so far, the Radeon GPUs seem to encode AV1 streams just as well as GeForce GPUs, and ReLive is every bit as good as ShadowPlay. AMD's software is generally more polished than the GeForce Experience and Nvidia Control Panel, and the fact that you don't require an account to use it is a nice bonus.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/24.jpg" alt="">
<p>Of course, these features deserve a deeper dive, and hopefully, that's something we can explore in the near future, similar to what we did recently with DLSS vs. FSR. We found that for the most part, DLSS offers superior image quality to that of FSR, though we did note that both technologies are somewhat poor at 1080p and lower and should ideally only be used at 1440p or greater if possible. We certainly think AMD has caught Nvidia in many areas, with the only major omission now being a frame generation competitor.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the problem for a part like the Radeon RX 7600 is that there's really nothing drawing gamers to it, and that's ignoring the fact that previous-generation GPUs are still a better buy. So even if we isolate just the RX 7600 and RTX 4060, it's hard to imagine a world where just these two products exist, and most gamers would even consider the Radeon GPU for a $30 discount.</p>
<img src="./assets/images/gpu/25.jpg" alt="">
<p>Although we're completely uninterested in ray tracing support at this performance tier, we'd likely still choose the GeForce RTX 4060 over the Radeon RX 7600. For example, in the games we do play, such as Fortnite, the RTX 4060 will generally offer a better experience, and if we want to game at 1440p, DLSS upscaling will typically deliver better image quality.</p>
<p>For AMD to win us over here, the Radeon 7600 would need to cost $250. There's simply no way the RTX 4060 is worth $50 more at this price tier; that's a 20% premium, and we can forgo those GeForce advantages for that kind of saving. But of course, let us know what you think about this matchup and which one you would buy, were you unfortunate enough to live in a world where only these two options exist at the current prices.</p>
<div class="author d-grid">
<div class="author-image-box">
<img src="./assets/images/dummy-user.png" alt="" class="article-image">
</div>
<div class="author-about">
<h3 class="author-name">Ramanan</h3>
<p>Tech Enthusiast , student at KCE</p>
<ul class="list social-media">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link"><i class="ri-instagram-line"></i></a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link"><i class="ri-facebook-circle-line"></i></a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link"><i class="ri-twitter-line"></i></a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<!-- Newsletter -->
<section class="newsletter section">
<div class="container">
<h2 class="title section-title" data-name="Newsletter">Newsletter</h2>
<div class="form-container-inner">
<h6 class="title newsletter-title">Subscribe to TechFlash</h6>
<p class="newsletter-description">stay connected</p>
<form action="" class="form">
<input class="form-input" type="text" placeholder="Enter your email address">
<button class="btn form-btn" type="submit">
<i class="ri-mail-send-line"></i>
</button>
</form>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<!-- Footer -->
<footer class="footer section">
<div class="footer-container container d-grid">
<div class="company-data">
<a href="./index.html">
<h2 class="logo">TechFlash</h2>
</a>
<p class="company-description">Stay ahead of the curve with our tech flash – the latest news and reviews on all the latest devices and software!</p>
<ul class="list social-media">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="https://www.instagram.com" class="list-link"><i class="ri-instagram-line"></i></a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="https://www.facebook.com" class="list-link"><i class="ri-facebook-circle-line"></i></a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="https://twitter.com" class="list-link"><i class="ri-twitter-line"></i></a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="https://in.pinterest.com" class="list-link"><i class="ri-pinterest-line"></i></a>
</li>
</ul>
<span class="copyright-notice">©2023 TechFlash. All rights reserved.</span>
</div>
<div>
<h6 class="title footer-title">Categories</h6>
<ul class="footer-list list">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">AI</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">IOT</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">E-sports</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Software</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Blockchain</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">How-to-do</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h6 class="title footer-title">Useful links</h6>
<ul class="footer-list list">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Home</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Elements</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Tags</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Authors</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h6 class="title footer-title">Company</h6>
<ul class="footer-list list">
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Contact us</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">F.A.Q</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Careers</a>
</li>
<li class="list-item">
<a href="#" class="list-link">Authors</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</footer>
<!-- Swiper.js -->
<script src="./assets/js/swiper-bundle.min.js"></script>
<!-- Custom script -->
<script src="./assets/js/main.js"></script>
</body>
</html>