From 74486d59fd4b0610c92fa23f66050aa48b31fbc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: annie171261 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 17:28:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] typos --- the-pulse/posts/2026/07/31/DQUL_July.qmd | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/the-pulse/posts/2026/07/31/DQUL_July.qmd b/the-pulse/posts/2026/07/31/DQUL_July.qmd index 1686ed93..d2eec76e 100644 --- a/the-pulse/posts/2026/07/31/DQUL_July.qmd +++ b/the-pulse/posts/2026/07/31/DQUL_July.qmd @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- title: "Data Quality Under the Lens: Was the 2020 US Census “fit-for-apportionment”?" description: | - July's case of the month explores whether 2020 US census data was fit for the apportionment of representatives for electionS in the US. + July's case of the month explores whether 2020 US census data was fit for the apportionment of representatives for elections in the US. categories: - AI - Governance @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Note: This article has been adapted, expanded and updated alongside the authors ::: {.g-col-12 .g-col-md-6} -**Copyright and licence** : © 2026 Roger Hoerl and Hannah de Mowbray +**Copyright and licence** : © 2026 Tom Redman, Roger Hoerl and Hannah de Mowbray