Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @sarthak181]

[nus-se-bot]

@sarthak181 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

Example from src/main/java/duke/Event.java lines 21-21:

        boolean c = true;

Example from src/main/java/duke/Event.java lines 22-22:

        boolean d = true;

Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

Example from src/main/java/duke/Storage.java lines 44-44:

//                new FileWriter(filePath, false).close();

Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

possible problems in commit e036719:

Added JUnit

• Not in imperative mood (?)

Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (no need to modify past commit messages).

Aspect: Binary files in repo

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.