Skip to content

Storm 2.0 meets Sylvan 2.0 #747

@sjunges

Description

@sjunges

Oh btw I'm working on a pretty major version update on Sylvan, see this issue. It's going to break everything. If you want to see certain things as Storm is certainly a major user, do let me know.

Originally posted by @trolando in #274

My big wish would basically be that we can have the necessary modifications we require on top of sylvan 2.0 rather than within sylvan. That makes it so much easier to maintain.

Specifics (top of my head):

  • It would be great if one can avoid modifying sylvan when adding new leaf types. We have our polynomials, we might soon want to add intervals. But keeping sylvan up to date is a pain because we changed stuff.
  • There are potentially a number of operations we want to backport. Not sure?
  • I think the sylvan cmake is quite good, yet we had to change quite a bit, some of which are due to the additional dependencies we have. It may be worth investing a bit into making sure we don't need to modify the build system.
  • ARM multi-threading support (even when slower)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions