Skip to content

Treatment of DC terms in specification #2

Description

@stuartasutton

There are DC terms in the documentation with Kernel "coded synonyms" that I somehow think should be formally documented somewhere. In this sense of inclusion, it is somewhat like an application profile (AP) of sorts. Should there be a representation of these terms in the turtle specification of Kernel terms? Or is this something akin to a separate AP document (e.g., documented in the manner of a BIBFRAME AP (i.e., a kind of JSON representation)). OR, am I simply over-thinking this aspect (quite, quite possible).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions